Adapting Cutoffs to the Choice Environment: The Effects of Attribute Correlation and Reliability

Consumers frequently simplify complex choices by setting attribute cutoffs, which are minimum acceptable levels that an alternative must possess to be considered further. The authors explore the extent to which consumers adapt these cutoffs to the choice environment. They show that, as the reliability of information about the attribute increases, consumers make more severe cutoffs (i.e., fewer attribute levels are acceptable), Further, positive correlations between attributes elicit more severe cutoffs than negative correlations do, and consumers' expectations about the choice outcome partially mediate this relationship. The format of correlational information also affects adaptation: consumers adapt their cutoffs when they are given direct information about the correlation, but not when they are allowed to infer the correlation from a set of alternatives. Overall, consumers appear to adapt to information about reliability and correlations, but they have difficulty assessing correlation from the choice environment. Copyright 1991 by the University of Chicago.

[1]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Inference Effects without Inference Making? Effects of Missing Information on Discounting and Use of Presented Information , 1991 .

[2]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Covariation Assessment by Consumers , 1986 .

[3]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[4]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product , 1990 .

[5]  Steven M. Shugan The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[6]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations , 1977 .

[7]  Peter Wright,et al.  State-of-mind effects on the accuracy with which utility functions predict marketplace choice. , 1980 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[9]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Product-Level Choice: A Top-Down or Bottom-Up Process? , 1989 .

[10]  N. Klein,et al.  Utility and decision strategies: a second look at the rational decision maker. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[11]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[12]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[13]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[14]  Noreen M. Klein,et al.  An Investigation of Utility-Directed Cutoff Selection , 1987 .

[15]  Preferences Scientific Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .

[16]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Olshavsky,et al.  Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Brand Choice , 1979 .

[18]  James R. Bettman,et al.  Processes of Adaptivity in Decision Making , 1988 .

[19]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  Judgment of Covariation by Social Perceivers , 1981 .