New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results

A real improvement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery would be achieved if a global kinematic evaluation of graft performance could be made during surgery. A quantitative evaluation of all residual instabilities would be helpful in the evaluation of graft performances. This paper describes a new protocol for an accurate and extensive computer-assisted in vivo evaluation of joint laxities during ACL reconstruction. Fifteen in vivo kinematic evaluations during ACL reconstruction were performed using an optical localizer and custom software. The capability of the protocol was studied by analyzing the accuracy and repeatability of the results, the ergonomics of the setup, time taken, interactions with the surgical steps, and efficacy of the acquisitions. Repeatability of the tests, at maximum force, remained under 1 mm/2°. Repeatability in tibia position and orientation was lower than 1 mm/4°. Secondary laxities during stress tests remained under 2 mm/3°. Added time to surgery was about 11 min. ACL graft increased joint stability up to 52% with respect to the preoperative level. The simplicity and morbidity of the test procedure and system was minimally invasive and allowed a quantitative evaluation of knee laxities at time zero. The repeatability of the tests opens the way for future research on in vivo evaluation of different ACL reconstruction techniques, which may lead to a better understanding of associated lesions and their role to the global knee stability.

[1]  Stefano Zaffagnini,et al.  Computer investigation of ACL orientation during passive range of motion , 2004, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[2]  N. D. Weiss,et al.  Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair , 1991, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[3]  R. Pedowitz,et al.  Initial laxity does not correlate with subsequent laxity after ACL reconstruction in humans: a prospective evaluation. , 2004, American journal of orthopedics.

[4]  Stefano Zaffagnini,et al.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[5]  Paul Allard,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of human movement , 1995 .

[6]  A. Amis,et al.  Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  K. Shino,et al.  Measurement of anterior instability of the knee. A new apparatus for clinical testing. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  K. Markolf,et al.  In vivo rotatory knee stability. Ligamentous and muscular contributions. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Roland P. Jakob,et al.  A New Mechanical Testing Device for Measuring Anteroposterior Knee Laxity , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  W. Mihalko,et al.  Stability After Medial Collateral Ligament Release in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  Tibial anatomy and functional axes , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  J. Richmond,et al.  Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  K. Markolf,et al.  Measurement of knee stiffness and laxity in patients with documented absence of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  F. Handelberg,et al.  The role of the Rolimeter in quantifying knee instability compared to the functional outcome of ACL-reconstructed versus conservatively-treated knees , 2004, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[15]  D G Murray,et al.  The longitudinal axis of the knee and the role of the cruciate ligaments in controlling transverse rotation. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  G. Losse,et al.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  The Rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000 , 2000, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  W. D. Cannon,et al.  Use of Arthrometers to Assess Knee Laxity and Outcomes , 2002 .

[19]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of instrumented knee‐drawer tests , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  Yuji Yamamoto,et al.  Knee Stability and Graft Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  Sandra Martelli,et al.  New method for simultaneous anatomical and functional studies of articular joints and its application to the human knee , 2003, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[22]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[23]  S. Zaffagnini,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Kinematic Protocol for Computer-Assisted Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  C. Rangger,et al.  Comparison of Score Evaluations and Instrumented Measurement after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  H. Balasch,et al.  Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer , 1999, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[26]  P Boyer,et al.  [Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric) for measuring anterior knee laxity: comparison with Telos in 147 knees]. , 2004, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[27]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  N. Langrana,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of ligament constraints in the knee. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  M Tew,et al.  Is the KT1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable? , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.