Avaliação física do tomate de mesa 'Romana' durante manuseio na pós-colheita

Tomato postharvest losses are very high in Brazil and the goal of this research was to evaluate the effect of handling and the transport of tomato fruits, cultivar Romana on the steps of harvesting, weight and transportation to the packinghouse, pointing some critical points. Tomatoes were harvested at plastic boxes, weighted and shipped to a packinghouse. Fruits taken directly from the plant were determined as reference. The parameters evaluated were weight loss and mechanical injury and tomato physical quality after storage during 21 days. It was observed an increasing on the weight loss, external damage, and postharvest losses, after storage. Handling and transportation were the cause of an increase in 6.6% in external damage and 1.93% of weight loss after storage, when comparing harvested fruits and fruits evaluated on the packing-house. The main reason for postharvest losses was due to mechanical injury caused during transportation mainly due to the compressure force among fruits and against the plastic boxes.

[1]  A. Kander Composition and flavor quality of fresh market tomatoes as influenced by some postharvest handling procedures , 1978 .

[2]  O. Kunze,et al.  Bruising Characteristics of Peaches Related to Mechanical Harvesting , 1975 .

[3]  Steven A. Sargent,et al.  Alteração de sabor e aroma em tomates causada por impacto , 2000 .

[4]  S. Sargent,et al.  Chemical Composition and Physical Properties of Pericarp, Locule, and Placental Tissues of Tomatoes with Internal Bruising , 1998 .

[5]  R. W. Bajema,et al.  Packing Line Bruise Evaluation for ‘Walla Walla’ Summer Sweet Onions , 1995 .

[6]  METODOLOGIA PARA QUANTIFICAÇÃO E CARACTERIZAÇÃO DAS PERDAS PÓS-COLHEITA DE TOMATE NO VAREJO , 1999 .

[7]  David W. Stanley,et al.  Measurement of Tomato Fruit Firmness , 1990 .

[8]  N. Maness,et al.  Impact bruise resistance comparison among peach cultivars , 1992 .

[9]  J. M. Harvey Reduction of Losses in Fresh Market Fruits and Vegetables , 1978 .

[10]  R. F. Testin,et al.  PEACH BRUISING: SUSCEPTIBILITY TO IMPACT, VIBRATION, AND COMPRESSION ABUSE , 1991 .

[11]  G. K. Brown,et al.  Impact Bruise Estimates for Onion Packing Lines , 1991 .

[12]  G. H. Brusewitz,et al.  IMPACT BRUISE RESISTANCE OF PEACHES , 1991 .

[13]  J. E. Holt,et al.  A model to predict damage to horticultural produce duringtransport , 1991 .

[14]  J. Brecht,et al.  Sensitivity of Tomatoes at Mature-green and Breaker Ripeness Stages to Internal Bruising , 1992 .

[15]  Nirlene J. Vilela,et al.  Viabilidade técnica e econômica da caixa Embrapa para comercialização de tomate para consumo in natura , 2002 .

[16]  P. Chen,et al.  PREDICTION OF APPLE BRUISING DUE TO IMPACT ON DIFFERENT SURFACES , 1991 .