Double opponency as a generalized concept in texture segregation illustrated with stimuli defined by color, luminance, and orientation

We present a series of experiments in texture discrimination with textures whose local elements are defined by their color (red and/or green), luminance polarity, and orientation (vertical and/or horizontal). The 23 distinct texture configurations were designed for testing and parameterizing a model based on the generalization of the concept of double opponency. The double-opponent mechanisms of the model are classified into four domains: the luminance- and color-oriented (LO and CO) domains and the luminance- and color-nonoriented (LnO and CnO) domains. Texture edge strength is extracted from the weighted, half-wave rectified outputs of each double-opponent mechanism. These signals are then combined through probability summation within each domain. Overall sensitivity to a given texture pair is predicted by the probability summation of all the domain outputs. Good fits of the experimental data are obtained when the contribution of the CO domain is the smallest and the contribution of the CnO domain is the largest. We suggest that the double-opponency principle is a natural way of implementing spatial interactions in higher-order domains and that it could be generalized to other dimensions such as spatial frequency, motion, and stereopsis.

[1]  D. Ts'o,et al.  The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations , 1991, Vision Research.

[4]  C. R. Michael Color vision mechanisms in monkey striate cortex: dual-opponent cells with concentric receptive fields. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  A. B. Bonds Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[6]  Norma Graham,et al.  Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[7]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[8]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  A Gorea,et al.  Texture segregation by chromatic and achromatic visual pathways: an analogy with motion processing. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  J. Bergen,et al.  Texture segregation and orientation gradient , 1991, Vision Research.

[11]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in striate cortex of macaque , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  E. Adelson,et al.  Early vision and texture perception , 1988, Nature.

[13]  C. R. Michael Color vision mechanisms in monkey striate cortex: simple cells with dual opponent-color receptive fields. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[15]  A Bradley,et al.  Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  A Gorea,et al.  Motion processing by chromatic and achromatic visual pathways. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[18]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Computing texture boundaries from images , 1988, Nature.

[19]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  H. Nothdurft Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks , 1985, Vision Research.

[23]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial mapping of monkey VI cells with pure color and luminance stimuli , 1984, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Lateral inhibition between spatially adjacent spatial-frequency channels? , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  A. Gorea,et al.  New look at Bloch's law for contrast. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  C. R. Ingling,et al.  The spatiotemporal properties of the r-g X-cell channel , 1985, Vision Research.

[29]  G. Sperling Three stages and two systems of visual processing. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[30]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Filters Versus Textons in Human and Machine Texture Discrimination , 1992 .

[32]  Graeme R. Cole,et al.  Texture segregation with luminance and chromatic contrast , 1990, Vision Research.

[33]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  C. R. Michael Color-sensitive complex cells in monkey striate cortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  B. S. Rubenstein,et al.  Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[36]  A Gorea,et al.  Equivalent luminance contrast of red-green drifting stimuli: dependency on luminance-color interactions and on the psychophysical task. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  N. Daw,et al.  Goldfish Retina: Organization for Simultaneous Color Contrast , 1967, Science.

[38]  P. Lennie,et al.  Mechanisms of color vision. , 1988, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[39]  A. Watson Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.