The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli

In the third trimester of pregnancy, the human fetus has the capacity to process perceptual information [1-3]. With advances in 4D ultrasound technology, detailed assessment of fetal behavior [4] is now possible. Furthermore, modeling of intrauterine conditions has indicated a substantially greater luminance within the uterus than previously thought [5]. Consequently, light conveying perceptual content could be projected through the uterine wall and perceived by the fetus, dependent on how light interfaces with maternal tissue. We do know that human infants at birth show a preference to engage with a top-heavy, face-like stimulus when contrasted with all other forms of stimuli [6, 7]. However, the viability of performing such an experiment based on visual stimuli projected through the uterine wall with fetal participants is not currently known. We examined fetal head turns to visually presented upright and inverted face-like stimuli. Here we show that the fetus in the third trimester of pregnancy is more likely to engage with upright configural stimuli when contrasted to inverted visual stimuli, in a manner similar to results with newborn participants. The current study suggests that postnatal experience is not required for this preference. In addition, we describe a new method whereby it is possible to deliver specific visual stimuli to the fetus. This new technique provides an important new pathway for the assessment of prenatal visual perceptual capacities.

[1]  Giorgio Metta,et al.  Staring us in the face? An embodied theory of innate face preference. , 2014, Developmental science.

[2]  L. Rogers Light input and the reversal of functional lateralization in the chicken brain , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  J. DiPietro,et al.  STUDIES IN FETAL BEHAVIOR: REVISITED, RENEWED, AND REIMAGINED. , 2015, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[4]  P. Rochat What is it Like to be a Newborn , 2011 .

[5]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[6]  N. Reissland,et al.  The development of anticipation in the fetus: a longitudinal account of human fetal mouth movements in reaction to and anticipation of touch. , 2014, Developmental psychobiology.

[7]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  The development of parafoveal and mid-peripheral human retina , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  V. Reid,et al.  The functional foetal brain: A systematic preview of methodological factors in reporting foetal visual and auditory capacity , 2015, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  L. Dubowitz,et al.  Visual function in the newborn: A study of preterm and full-term infants , 1980, Brain and Development.

[10]  M. Witt,et al.  Embryonic and early fetal development of human taste buds: A transmission electron microscopical study , 1996, The Anatomical record.

[11]  Y. Kuniyoshi,et al.  Modeling the Minimal Newborn's Intersubjective Mind: The Visuotopic-Somatotopic Alignment Hypothesis in the Superior Colliculus , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  M. Giudice Alone in the dark? Modeling the conditions for visual experience in human fetuses , 2011 .

[13]  H. Prechtl,et al.  Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? , 1982, Early human development.

[14]  A. Prats-Galino,et al.  Fetal facial expression in response to intravaginal music emission , 2015, Ultrasound.

[15]  C Umiltà,et al.  Preferential orienting to faces in newborns: a temporal-nasal asymmetry. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks , 2006, Current Biology.

[17]  M S Patterson,et al.  Optical properties of normal and diseased human breast tissues in the visible and near infrared. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  U. Castiello,et al.  Evidence of early development of action planning in the human foetus: a kinematic study , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[20]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[21]  Cynthia A Toth,et al.  Histologic development of the human fovea from midgestation to maturity. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  A. Decasper,et al.  Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer Their Mothers' Voices , 1980 .

[23]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[24]  Brian Francis,et al.  Do Facial Expressions Develop before Birth? , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  Hideko Takeshita,et al.  Do Human Fetuses Anticipate Self‐Oriented Actions? A Study by Four‐Dimensional (4D) Ultrasonography , 2006 .

[26]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  L. Dubowitz,et al.  The Development of Visual Function in Normal and Neurologically Abnormal Preterm and Fullterm Infants , 1982, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[28]  R. L. Fantz Pattern Vision in Newborn Infants , 1963, Science.

[29]  S. Jacques Optical properties of biological tissues: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  L M Dubowitz,et al.  Visual Function in the Preterm and Fullterm Newborn Infant , 1980, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[31]  P. Baraldi,et al.  Vision in the neonate (full-term and premature): Preliminary result of the application of some testing methods , 1981, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[32]  Alison Abbott,et al.  Neuroscience: The brain, interrupted , 2015, Nature.

[33]  Lindsay T Sharpe,et al.  The dependence of luminous efficiency on chromatic adaptation. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[34]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews the Two-process Theory of Face Processing: Modifications Based on Two Decades of Data from Infants and Adults , 2022 .

[35]  E. Mercuri,et al.  Visual function assessment in late-preterm newborns. , 2012, Early human development.

[36]  M. Stanojevic,et al.  Continuity between fetal and neonatal neurobehavior. , 2012, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[37]  D. Copenhagen,et al.  A direct and melanopsin-dependent fetal light response regulates mouse eye development , 2013, Nature.