The Diabetes Quality Improvement Project: moving science into health policy to gain an edge on the diabetes epidemic.

As the worldwide diabetes epidemic continues to unfold, some experts have asked whether the war against it is being lost (1,2,3). In the U.S., blindness, kidney failure, amputations, and cardiovascular disease resulting from diabetes not only markedly reduce quality and length of life but also cost nearly $100 billion annually (4,5,6,7). Fortunately, a vast body of research has clearly established that several effective treatments and practices may substantially reduce or prevent this burden (8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19). These interventions, if broadly implemented, can allow us to use our health efforts and resources more effectively and efficiently to minimize the diabetes burden. Judging from the scant data available, however, the level of care currently delivered to populations with diabetes often may not produce the possible health-related gains (20,21). To assess more completely the level of diabetes care delivered in the U.S., we need standardized uniform performance measures that can assess quality of care accurately and reliably. These measures will enhance uptake of research into practice and may ultimately improve diabetes care and clinical outcomes. In the early to mid-1990s, many organizations developed performance measures for diabetes care, but the result was that providers were often required to collect and report many different, sometimes conflicting, measures, depending on their care delivery system. It was recognized that a national consensus on measures could enhance this process and provide a method for assessing care within and across health care settings while providing a meaningful mechanism for quality improvement (QI). In this review, we describe the Diabetes Quality Improvement Project (DQIP), which has developed and implemented a comprehensive set of national measures for evaluation …

[1]  B. B. Fleming,et al.  Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels. , 2000, JAMA.

[2]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. , 2000 .

[3]  C Sennett,et al.  Clinical goals and performance measures for cholesterol management in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. , 2000, JAMA.

[4]  M. Safran,et al.  The war against diabetes. How will we know if we are winning? , 1999, Diabetes care.

[5]  B. Davis,et al.  Cardiovascular events and their reduction with pravastatin in diabetic and glucose-intolerant myocardial infarction survivors with average cholesterol levels: subgroup analyses in the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial. The Care Investigators. , 1998, Circulation.

[6]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 , 1998, BMJ.

[7]  R. Holman,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. , 1998 .

[8]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[9]  M. Engelgau,et al.  Population-Based Assessment of the Level of Care Among Adults With Diabetes in the U.S , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[10]  H. King,et al.  Global Burden of Diabetes, 1995–2025: Prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[11]  C. Clark How Should We Respond to the Worldwide Diabetes Epidemic? , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[12]  R. Hayward,et al.  Estimated Benefits of Glycemic Control in Microvascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  A. Zbrozek,et al.  Model of Complications of NIDDM: II. Analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[14]  Terje R Pedersen,et al.  Cholesterol Lowering With Simvastatin Improves Prognosis of Diabetic Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[15]  B. Davis,et al.  Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[16]  M. Lishner,et al.  Long-term renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A 7-year follow-up study. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  R. Klein Hyperglycemie and Microvascular and Macrovascular Disease in Diabetes , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[18]  康生 大久保,et al.  Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus : a randomized prospective 6-year study , 1995 .

[19]  W. O'Fallon,et al.  The contribution of non-insulin-dependent diabetes to lower-extremity amputation in the community. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  Walker,et al.  Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients , 1994 .

[21]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  P. Reichard,et al.  The effect of long-term intensified insulin treatment on the development of microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  D. Bild,et al.  Reduction of Lower Extremity Clinical Abnormalities in Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  F. Ferris Aspirin effects on mortality and morbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report 14. ETDRS Investigators. , 1992, JAMA.

[25]  S. Colagiuri,et al.  The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1983, Henry Ford Hospital medical journal.