Stereology for anisotropic cells: Application to growth cartilage *

A number of either new or recently available stereological methods are described for estimating volume, surface area and number of anisotropic cells. The methods are illustrated with direct reference to the epiphyseal growth plate. Different estimates of a given quantity are obtained by applying alternative methods to the same set of sections, in order to compare the relative merits of the methods. For instance, the surface area of the cells is estimated via the Dimroth–Watson model (which gives a measure of the degree of anisotropy in addition to the surface area estimate) and from vertical sections using cycloid test systems. Cell number is estimated by traditional unfolding methods and by the new disector method. Also, volume‐weighted mean cell volume is estimated from vertical sections via point‐sampled intercepts using two different kinds of rulers to classify intercept lengths. Finally, nested design statistics is applied to a set of data from twelve animals in order to compare the relative impacts of biological and stereological (sampling) variations on the observed coefficient of error of a group mean estimate. The preferred methods are listed in the final section.

[1]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Precise and general conditions for the validity of a comprehensive set of stereological fundamental formulae , 1976 .

[2]  H. Hadwiger Altes und Neues über konvexe Körper , 1955 .

[3]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Sampling designs for stereology * , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[4]  David R. Bellhouse,et al.  Area Estimation by Point-Counting Techniques: , 1981 .

[5]  E. Weibel,et al.  Estimating length density and quantifying anisotropy in skeletal muscle capillaries , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  H. J. G. Gundersen Quantitative Analysis of Three-Dimensional Structures in Neuroanatomy , 1985 .

[7]  G. Zbinden,et al.  Morphometric and biochemical analysis of adrenal medullary hyperplasia induced by nicotine in rats , 1984, Archives of Toxicology.

[8]  L. Cruz-Orive Estimating Particle Number and Size , 1985 .

[9]  T. Mattfeldt,et al.  Estimation of length and surface of anisotropic capillaries , 1984, Journal of microscopy.

[10]  D. C. Sterio The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector , 1984, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect , 1977 .

[12]  H. Gundersen Stereology of arbitrary particles * , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Stereological estimation of the volume‐weighted mean volume of arbitrary particles observed on random sections * , 1985, Journal of microscopy.

[14]  G. Hardy,et al.  What is Mathematics? , 1942, Nature.

[15]  L. M. Orive,et al.  Particle size‐shape distributions: the general spheroid problem: II. Stochastic model and practical guide , 1978 .

[16]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Estimation of surface area from vertical sections , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[18]  The stereological estimation of moments of particle volume , 1985 .

[19]  J. E. Hilliard,et al.  Determination of Structural Anisotropy , 1967 .

[20]  Eva B. Vedel Jensen,et al.  Particle sizes and their distributions estimated from line‐ and point‐sampled intercepts. Including graphical unfolding , 1983 .

[21]  F. Reinholt,et al.  Stereological studies on the epiphyseal growth plate with special reference to the distribution of matrix vesicles. , 1982, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[22]  H. Moor,et al.  Cartilage ultrastructure after high pressure freezing, freeze substitution, and low temperature embedding. I. Chondrocyte ultrastructure--implications for the theories of mineralization and vascular invasion , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  E. Hunziker,et al.  Improved cartilage fixation by ruthenium hexammine trichloride (RHT). A prerequisite for morphometry in growth cartilage. , 1982, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[24]  Ewald R. Weibel,et al.  Stereological Analysis of Anisotropic Structures using Directional Statistics , 1985 .

[25]  L. Cruz-Orive,et al.  Distribution‐free estimation of sphere size distributions from slabs showing overprojection and truncation, with a review of previous methods , 1983 .

[26]  K. Mardia Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .

[27]  B. Heller Circular Statistics in Biology, Edward Batschelet. Academic Press, London & New York (1981), 371, Price $69.50 , 1983 .

[28]  T. Mayhew,et al.  Inter‐animal variation and its influence on the overall precision of morphometric estimates based on nested sampling designs , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[29]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Consistent and efficient delineation of reference spaces for light microscopical stereology using a laser microbeam system , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[30]  H. Hadwiger Vorlesungen über Inhalt, Oberfläche und Isoperimetrie , 1957 .

[31]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The impact of recent stereological advances on quantitative studies of the nervous system , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  P. Echlin Analysis of organic and biological surfaces , 1984 .

[33]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Measuring error and sampling variation in stereology: comparison of the efficiency of various methods for planar image analysis , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[34]  E. R. Weibel,et al.  Stereological Methods. Vol. 1: Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry@@@Stereological Methods. Vol. 2: Theoretical Foundations , 1982 .

[35]  R. E. Miles,et al.  On the choice of quadrats in stereology , 1977 .