Simulations of Polarimetric Radar Signatures of a Supercell Storm Using a Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics Scheme

A new general polarimetric radar simulator for nonhydrostatic numerical weather prediction (NWP) models has been developed based on rigorous scattering calculations using the T-matrix method for reflectivity, differential reflectivity, specific differential phase, and copolar cross-correlation coefficient. A continuous melting process accounts for the entire spectrum of varying density and dielectric constants. This simulator is able to simulate polarimetric radar measurements at weather radar frequency bands and can take as input the prognostic variables of high-resolution NWP model simulations using one-, two-, and threemoment microphysics schemes. The simulator was applied at 10.7-cm wavelength to a model-simulated supercell storm using a double-moment (two moment) bulk microphysics scheme to examine its ability to simulate polarimetric signatures reported in observational studies. The simulated fields exhibited realistic polarimetric signatures that include ZDR and KDP columns, ZDR arc, midlevel ZDR and rhy rings, hail signature, and KDP foot in terms of their general location, shape, and strength. The authors compared the simulation with one employing a single-moment (SM) microphysics scheme and found that certain signatures, such as ZDR arc, midlevel ZDR, and rhy rings, cannot be reproduced with the latter. It is believed to be primarily caused by the limitation of the SM scheme in simulating the shift of the particle size distribution toward larger/smaller diameters, independent of mixing ratio. These results suggest that two- or higher-moment microphysics schemes should be used to adequately describe certain important microphysical processes. They also demonstrate the utility of a well-designed radar simulator for validating numerical models. In addition, the simulator can also serve as a training tool for forecasters to recognize polarimetric signatures that can be reproduced by advanced NWP models.

[1]  Roy Rasmussen,et al.  Multiparameter radar measurements in Colorado convective storms. Part I. Graupel melting studies , 1986 .

[2]  E. Brandes.  Mesocyclone Evolution and Tornadogenesis: Some Observations , 1978 .

[3]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Polarimetric method for ice water content determination , 1996 .

[4]  K. Droegemeier,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: Model dynamics and verification , 2000 .

[5]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model , 1983 .

[6]  V. N. Bringi,et al.  Dual-Polarization observations of Microbursts Associated with Intense Convection: The 20 July Storm during the MIST Project , 1988 .

[7]  J. W. Conway,et al.  A Study of Embryo Production and Hail Growth Using Dual-Doppler and Multiparameter Radars , 1993 .

[8]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  Simultaneous state estimation and attenuation correction for thunderstorms with radar data using an ensemble Kalman filter: tests with simulated data , 2009 .

[9]  A. S. Omar,et al.  Scattering by Dielectric Obstacles Inside Guiding Structures , 1984 .

[10]  K. A. Browning,et al.  Airflow and Structure of a Tornadic Storm , 1963 .

[11]  Martin Hagen,et al.  Polarimetric radar studies of atmospheric ice particles , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Jidong Gao,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation , 2003 .

[13]  D. Zrnic,et al.  Doppler Radar and Weather Observations , 1984 .

[14]  Jerry M. Straka,et al.  Enhanced polarimetric radar signatures above the melting level in a supercell storm , 2002 .

[15]  John D. Marwitz,et al.  The Structure and Motion of Severe Hailstorms. Part I: Supercell Storms , 1972 .

[16]  M. Yau,et al.  A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part IV: Sensitivity Experiments , 2006 .

[17]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Drop Size Distributions Measured by a 2D Video Disdrometer: Comparison with Dual-Polarization Radar Data , 2001 .

[18]  Guifu Zhang,et al.  Experiments in Rainfall Estimation with a Polarimetric Radar in a Subtropical Environment , 2002 .

[19]  Guifu Zhang,et al.  Comparison of Polarimetric Radar Drop Size Distribution Retrieval Algorithms , 2004 .

[20]  M. Xue,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications , 2001 .

[21]  Daniel T. Dawson,et al.  Comparison of Evaporation and Cold Pool Development between Single-moment and Multi-moment Bulk Microphysics Schemes in Idealized Simulations of Tornadic Thunderstorms , 2009 .

[22]  Jerry M. Straka,et al.  Assimilation of Simulated Polarimetric Radar Data for a Convective Storm Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter. Part II: Impact of Polarimetric Data on Storm Analysis , 2008 .

[23]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  The Tornado : its structure, dynamics, prediction, and hazards , 1993 .

[24]  Roger M. Wakimoto,et al.  Radar and Atmospheric Science: A Collection of Essays in Honor of David Atlas , 2003 .

[25]  William R. Cotton,et al.  New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization. Part II: The two-moment scheme , 1997 .

[26]  Robert B. Wilhelmson,et al.  Simulations of Right- and Left-Moving Storms Produced Through Storm Splitting , 1978 .

[27]  C. Kessinger,et al.  A Study of Thunderstorm Microphysics with Multiparameter Radar and Aircraft Observations , 1995 .

[28]  Jothiram Vivekanandan,et al.  Rigorous Approach to Polarimetric Radar Modeling of Hydrometeor Orientation Distributions , 1991 .

[29]  D. Dawson.  Impact of multi-moment microphysics and model resolution on predicted cold pool and reflectivity intensity and structures in the Oklahoma tornadic supercell storms of 3 May 1999 , 2007 .

[30]  A. Illingworth,et al.  Polarization radar studies of precipitation development in convective storms , 1987 .

[31]  K. Browning.  Airflow and Precipitation Trajectories Within Severe Local Storms Which Travel to the Right of the Winds , 1964 .

[32]  J. Marshall,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF RAINDROPS WITH SIZE , 1948 .

[33]  D. Burgess,et al.  A Dual-Polarization-Radar-Based Assessment of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Area Tornadic Supercell , 2008 .

[34]  A. Waldvogel,et al.  The N0 Jump of Raindrop Spectra , 1974 .

[35]  Nancy C. Knight,et al.  Hailstone Shape Factor and Its Relation to Radar Interpretation of Hail , 1986 .

[36]  Guifu Zhang,et al.  Assimilation of Simulated Polarimetric Radar Data for a Convective Storm Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter. Part I: Observation Operators for Reflectivity and Polarimetric Variables , 2008 .

[37]  M. Yau,et al.  A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part II: A Proposed Three-Moment Closure and Scheme Description , 2005 .

[38]  Daniel Rosenfeld,et al.  Cloud Microphysical Properties, Processes, and Rainfall Estimation Opportunities , 2003 .

[39]  Guifu Zhang,et al.  A method for estimating rain rate and drop size distribution from polarimetric radar measurements , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[40]  Robert B. Wilhelmson,et al.  Observed and numerically simulated structure of a mature supercell thunderstorm , 1981 .

[41]  C. Doswell,et al.  Severe Thunderstorm Evolution and Mesocyclone Structure as Related to Tornadogenesis , 1979 .

[42]  R. Rotunno.  On the evolution of thunderstorm rotation , 1981 .

[43]  Guifu Zhang,et al.  Error modeling of simulated reflectivity observations for ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of convective storms , 2007 .

[44]  E. Brandes.  Vertical Vorticity Generation and Mesocyclone Sustenance in Tornadic Thunderstorms: The Observational Evidence , 1984 .

[45]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  Ensemble kalman filter assimilation of doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model : OSS experiments , 2005 .

[46]  Joseph B. Klemp,et al.  The Dependence of Numerically Simulated Convective Storms on Vertical Wind Shear and Buoyancy , 1982 .

[47]  M. Yau,et al.  A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the Role of the Spectral Shape Parameter , 2005 .

[48]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  An OSSE Framework Based on the Ensemble Square Root Kalman Filter for Evaluating the Impact of Data from Radar Networks on Thunderstorm Analysis and Forecasting , 2006 .

[49]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Interpretation of Polarimetric Radar Covariance Matrix for Meteorological Scatterers: Theoretical Analysis , 2001 .

[50]  Young-Sun Jung.  STATE AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION USING POLARIMETRIC RADAR DATA AND AN ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER , 2008 .

[51]  D. J. Musil,et al.  Microphysical Characteristics of a Well-Developed Weak Echo Region in a High Plains Supercell Thunderstorm , 1986 .

[52]  Michele D'Amico,et al.  A Multiparameter Polarimetric Radar Simulator , 2001 .

[53]  Robert B. Wilhelmson,et al.  The Morphology of Several Tornadic Storms on 20 May 1977 , 1981 .

[54]  A. W. Green,et al.  An Approximation for the Shapes of Large Raindrops , 1975 .

[55]  A. Ryzhkov,et al.  Polarimetric Tornado Detection , 2005 .

[56]  Lawrence D. Carey,et al.  CSU-CHILL polarimetric radar measurements from a severe hail storm in eastern Colorado , 1998 .

[57]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Storm-Relative Helicity Revealed from Polarimetric Radar Measurements , 2009 .

[58]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Polarimetric Signatures in Supercell Thunderstorms , 2008 .

[59]  Erik N. Rasmussen,et al.  Precipitation Uncertainty Due to Variations in Precipitation Particle Parameters within a Simple Microphysics Scheme , 2004 .

[60]  Harry T. Ochs,et al.  Laboratory Measurements of Small Raindrop Distortion. Part I: Axis Ratios and Fall Behavior , 1991 .

[61]  W. Cotton,et al.  New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization part I: the single-moment scheme , 1995 .

[62]  Ming Xue,et al.  High-Order Monotonic Numerical Diffusion and Smoothing , 2000 .

[63]  Martin Hagen,et al.  A polarimetric radar forward operator for model evaluation , 2008 .