Evaluating Preference-based Search Tools: A Tale of Two Approaches

People frequently use the world-wide web to find their most preferred item among a large range of options. We call this task preference-based search. The most common tool for preference-based search on the WWW today obtains users' preferences by asking them to fill in a form. It then returns a list of items that most closely match these preferences. Recently, several researchers have proposed tools for preference-based search that elicit preferences from the critiques a user actively makes on examples shown to them. We carried out a user study in order to compare the performance of traditional preference-based search tools using form-filling with two different versions of an example-critiquing tool. The results show that example critiquing achieves almost three times the decision accuracy, while requiring only slightly higher interaction effort.

[1]  Austin Henderson,et al.  RABBIT: An Intelligent Database Assistant , 1982, AAAI.

[2]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Decision Tradeoff Using Example-Critiquing and Constraint Programming , 2004, Constraints.

[3]  Li Chen,et al.  Integrating tradeoff support in product search tools for e-commerce sites , 2005, EC '05.

[4]  Kristian J. Hammond,et al.  The FindMe Approach to Assisted Browsing , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[5]  Barry Smyth,et al.  On the Evaluation of Dynamic Critiquing: A Large-Scale User Study , 2005, AAAI.

[6]  Barry Smyth,et al.  On the Role of Diversity in Conversational Recommender Systems , 2003, ICCBR.

[7]  Hideo Shimazu,et al.  ExpertClerk: Navigating Shoppers Buying Process with the Combination of Asking and Proposing , 2001, IJCAI.

[8]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[9]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Sean M. McNee,et al.  Interfaces for Eliciting New User Preferences in Recommender Systems , 2003, User Modeling.

[11]  Greg Linden,et al.  Interactive Assessment of User Preference Models: The Automated Travel Assistant , 1997 .

[12]  Barry Smyth,et al.  A Live-User Evaluation of Incremental Dynamic Critiquing , 2005, ICCBR.

[13]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Fuzzy queries in multimedia database systems , 1998, PODS '98.

[14]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Solution Generation with Qualitative Models of Preferences , 2004, Comput. Intell..

[15]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[16]  David McSherry,et al.  Diversity-Conscious Retrieval , 2002, ECCBR.

[17]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Dynamic Critiquing , 2004, ECCBR.

[18]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Enriching buyers' experiences: the SmartClient approach , 2000, CHI.

[19]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[20]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Effective Interaction Principles for Online Product Search Environments , 2004, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04).

[21]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[22]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Wise choices : decisions, games, and negotiations , 1996 .

[23]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Interactive Critiquing forCatalog Navigation in E-Commerce , 2002, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[24]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .