Trends in Discharge Rates for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in U.S. Emergency Departments

BACKGROUND Outpatient management of select patients with low-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been proven to be safe and effective, yet recent evidence suggests that patients are still managed with hospitalization. Few studies have assessed contemporary real-world trends in discharge rates from U.S. emergency departments (EDs) for acute PE. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the proportion of discharges from EDs for acute PE changed between 2012 and 2020 and which baseline characteristics are associated with ED discharge. DESIGN Serial cross-sectional analysis. SETTING U.S. EDs participating in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. PATIENTS Patients with ED visits for acute PE between 2012 and 2020. MEASUREMENTS National trends in the proportion of discharges for acute PE and factors associated with ED discharge. RESULTS Between 2012 and 2020, there were approximately 1 635 300 visits for acute PE. Overall, ED discharge rates remained constant over time, with rates of 38.2% (95% CI, 17.9% to 64.0%) between 2012 and 2014 and 33.4% (CI, 21.0% to 49.0%) between 2018 and 2020 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.01 per year [CI, 0.89 to 1.14]). No baseline characteristics, including established risk stratification scores, were predictive of an increased likelihood of ED discharge; however, patients at teaching hospitals and those with private insurance were more likely to receive oral anticoagulation at discharge. Only 35.9% (CI, 23.9% to 50.0%) of patients who were considered low-risk according to their Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class, 33.1% (CI, 21.6% to 47.0%) according to simplified PESI score, and 34.8% (CI, 23.3% to 48.0%) according to hemodynamic stability were discharged from the ED setting. LIMITATIONS Cross-sectional survey design and inability to adjudicate diagnoses. CONCLUSION In a representative nationwide sample, rates of discharge from the ED for acute PE appear to have remained constant between 2012 and 2020. Only one third of low-risk patients were discharged for outpatient management, and rates seem to have stabilized. Outpatient management of low-risk acute PE may still be largely underutilized in the United States. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE None.

[1]  C. Greineder,et al.  Adverse Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism and Concerning Computed Tomography Imaging Findings , 2023, JAMA network open.

[2]  K. Ouriel,et al.  Incidence of Mortality and Complications in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2023, Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  Urvish K. Patel,et al.  Prevalence, Trends, and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism Treated with Mechanical and Surgical Thrombectomy from a Nationwide Inpatient Sample , 2022, Clinics and practice.

[4]  P. Lutsey,et al.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Acute Venous Thromboembolism Management: Trends and Postacute Healthcare Utilization From 2011 to 2018 , 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[5]  P. Stein,et al.  19-Year Trends in Mortality of Patients Hospitalized in the United States with High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism. , 2021, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  B. Horne,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of managing low-risk pulmonary embolism patients without hospitalization. The low-risk pulmonary embolism prospective management study. , 2020, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  R. Khatib,et al.  Outpatient management of patients presenting with venous thromboembolism: Retrospective cohort study at 11 community hospitals , 2020, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[8]  R. Dreyer,et al.  National Trends in Emergency Department Care Processes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2005 to 2015 , 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[9]  M. Forgie,et al.  Pulmonary embolism: update on management and controversies , 2020, BMJ.

[10]  C. Murray,et al.  US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016. , 2020, JAMA.

[11]  M. Humbert,et al.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) , 2019, European Respiratory Journal.

[12]  L. Irving,et al.  Early decision‐making in acute pulmonary embolism: a retrospective clinical audit , 2019, Internal medicine journal.

[13]  B. Horne,et al.  Management of Low‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Without Hospitalization: The Low‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism Prospective Management Study , 2018, Chest.

[14]  M. S. Mcmurtry,et al.  Trends in admission rates and in-hospital stay for venous thromboembolism. , 2017, Thrombosis research.

[15]  P. Roy,et al.  Outpatient management of pulmonary embolism. , 2017, Thrombosis research.

[16]  J. Berger,et al.  Underuse of Prevention and Lifestyle Counseling in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  William Prabhu,et al.  Pulmonary Embolism in 2017: Increasing Options for Increasing Incidence. , 2017, Rhode Island medical journal.

[18]  J. Spertus,et al.  Adoption of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guideline in Cardiology Practices Nationwide , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[19]  A. Singer,et al.  Admission rates for emergency department patients with venous thromboembolism and estimation of the proportion of low risk pulmonary embolism patients: a US perspective , 2016, Clinical and experimental emergency medicine.

[20]  R. Wunderink,et al.  Analysis of National Trends in Admissions for Pulmonary Embolism. , 2016, Chest.

[21]  G. Raskob,et al.  Global Burden of Thrombosis: Epidemiologic Aspects. , 2016, Circulation research.

[22]  H. Krumholz,et al.  National Trends in Pulmonary Embolism Hospitalization Rates and Outcomes for Adults Aged ≥65 Years in the United States (1999 to 2010). , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  A. Einstein,et al.  National trends in emergency room diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, 2001–2010: a cross-sectional study , 2015, Respiratory Research.

[24]  P. Wells,et al.  Outpatient treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Thrombosis research.

[25]  A. Seger,et al.  Hospital costs of acute pulmonary embolism. , 2013, The American journal of medicine.

[26]  E. Akl,et al.  Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. , 2012, Chest.

[27]  Nathan A. Pugh,et al.  Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[28]  P. Erkens,et al.  Safety of outpatient treatment in acute pulmonary embolism , 2010, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[29]  Lisa Moores,et al.  Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[30]  Roslyn A Stone,et al.  Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. , 2005, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[31]  J. Beer,et al.  Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe in a substantial proportion of patients 1 , 2003, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[32]  P. Stein,et al.  National Trends in Home Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism , 2018, Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis.

[33]  S. Suissa,et al.  Temporal trends in outpatient management of incident pulmonary embolism and associated mortality. , 2018, Thrombosis research.

[34]  S. Mody,et al.  Inpatient resource use and cost burden of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the United States. , 2015, Clinical therapeutics.

[35]  J. Richards,et al.  Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.