Exposure Limits: The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children

The existing cell phone certification process uses a plastic model of the head called the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM), representing the top 10% of U.S. military recruits in 1989 and greatly underestimating the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for typical mobile phone users, especially children. A superior computer simulation certification process has been approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) but is not employed to certify cell phones. In the United States, the FCC determines maximum allowed exposures. Many countries, especially European Union members, use the “guidelines” of International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), a non governmental agency. Radiofrequency (RF) exposure to a head smaller than SAM will absorb a relatively higher SAR. Also, SAM uses a fluid having the average electrical properties of the head that cannot indicate differential absorption of specific brain tissue, nor absorption in children or smaller adults. The SAR for a 10-year old is up to 153% higher than the SAR for the SAM model. When electrical properties are considered, a child's head's absorption can be over two times greater, and absorption of the skull's bone marrow can be ten times greater than adults. Therefore, a new certification process is needed that incorporates different modes of use, head sizes, and tissue properties. Anatomically based models should be employed in revising safety standards for these ubiquitous modern devices and standards should be set by accountable, independent groups.

[1]  Wolfgang Kainz,et al.  Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[2]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF) , 2007 .

[3]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Kurt Straif,et al.  Carcinogenicity of chemicals in industrial and consumer products, food contaminants and flavourings, and water chlorination byproducts. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  F. Alan Andersen,et al.  The American National Standards Institute , 1984, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[6]  Jacob Eberhardt,et al.  Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone. , 2009, Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology.

[7]  Ersan Odaci,et al.  Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus of rats: a stereological and histopathological study , 2008, Brain Research.

[8]  A. Pál,et al.  IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CELL PHONE USE AND SEMEN QUALITY? , 2005, Archives of andrology.

[9]  J. Herbertz Comment on the ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998, Health physics.

[10]  O. Gandhi Polarization and frequency effects on whole animal absorption of RF energy , 1974 .

[11]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Pooled analysis of two case–control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003 , 2006, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[12]  K. Straif,et al.  Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[15]  O.P. Gandhi,et al.  Inaccuracies of a plastic "pinna" SAM for SAR testing of cellular telephones against IEEE and ICNIRP safety guidelines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[16]  国際非電離放射線防護委員会 ICNIRP statement on the "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)". , 2009, Health physics.

[17]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Source of Funding and Results of Studies of Health Effects of Mobile Phone Use: Systematic Review of Experimental Studies , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  J F Bakker,et al.  Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  N. Seyhan,et al.  Apoptosis resulted from radiofrequency radiation exposure of pregnant rabbits and their infants , 2011 .

[20]  E. Cardis,et al.  Indications of possible brain-tumour risk in mobile-phone studies: should we be concerned? , 2011, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[21]  Lennart Hardell,et al.  Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including the long-term epidemiologic data. , 2009, Surgical neurology.

[22]  R. Aitken,et al.  Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. , 2005, International journal of andrology.

[23]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects. , 2011, International journal of oncology.

[24]  Eliza Varney,et al.  Institute Of Electrical And Electronic Engineers, Inc , 2010 .

[25]  C Gabriel,et al.  Changes in the dielectric properties of rat tissue as a function of age at microwave frequencies. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  John T. McConville,et al.  Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics 1988 , 1989 .

[27]  Ashok Agarwal,et al.  Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[28]  Seung-Kwon Myung,et al.  Mobile phone use and risk of tumors: a meta-analysis. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  G. Ziegelberger,et al.  International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. , 2006, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[30]  A. Swerdlow,et al.  A case–control study of risk of leukaemia in relation to mobile phone use , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz , 1996 .

[32]  Lars Malmgren,et al.  Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[33]  A. Zini,et al.  Risk of parotid malignant tumors in Israel (1970-2006). , 2011, Epidemiology.

[34]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of electromagnetic absorption characteristics in realistic human head models of adult and children for 900-MHz mobile telephones , 2003 .

[35]  M. Martínez‐Búrdalo,et al.  Comparison of FDTD-calculated specific absorption rate in adults and children when using a mobile phone at 900 and 1800 MHz. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  A. Otitoloju,et al.  Preliminary Study on the Induction of Sperm Head Abnormalities in Mice, Mus musculus, Exposed to Radiofrequency Radiations from Global System for Mobile Communication Base Stations , 2010, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[37]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors--a nationwide case-control study. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[38]  J. Wiart,et al.  Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[40]  Ieee Standards Board IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300 GHz , 1992 .

[41]  O P Gandhi,et al.  Power deposition in the head and neck of an anatomically based human body model for plane wave exposures. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours. , 2008, International journal of oncology.

[43]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Risk factors for leukemia in Thailand , 2009, Annals of Hematology.

[44]  G. Bulla,et al.  Electromagnetic Absorption in the Head of Adults and Children Due to Mobile Phone Operation Close to the Head , 2006, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[45]  N. Kuster,et al.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes , 2008, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[46]  A. Ahlbom,et al.  Mobile phone use and risk of parotid gland tumor. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[47]  A. Tomruk,et al.  The Influence of 1800 MHz GSM-like Signals on Hepatic Oxidative DNA and Lipid Damage in Nonpregnant, Pregnant, and Newly born Rabbits , 2009, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[48]  Gang Kang,et al.  SARs for pocket-mounted mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.