Information and Communication Technology and the Social Inclusion of Refugees

The social inclusion of newly resettled refugees is a significant issue confronting both refugees and their host societies. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are increasingly viewed as a useful resource in programs that provide settlement services or promote participation in society. This paper moves beyond the conventional discussion on the digital divide to explore what people are actually able to do and achieve with ICTs. We draw on an analysis of the use of ICTs for particular purposes by more than 50 resettled refugees to develop an explanation of the process by which ICT use contributes to their social inclusion. We propose that ICT constitutes a resource from which a set of five valuable capabilities is derived: to participate in an information society, to communicate effectively, to understand a new society, to be socially connected, and to express a cultural identity. In realizing these capabilities through ICT use, refugees exercise their agency and enhance their well-being in ways that assist them to function effectively in a new society and regain control over their disrupted lives.

[1]  Raelene Wilding,et al.  Digital escapes? ICTs, settlement and belonging among Karen Youth in Melbourne, Australia , 2013 .

[2]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Social Mechanisms for Causal Explanation in Social Theory Based IS Research , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Annemaree Lloyd,et al.  Connecting with new information landscapes: information literacy practices of refugees , 2013, J. Documentation.

[4]  Dorothea Kleine,et al.  Technologies of Choice? ICTs, Development and the Capabilities Approach , 2014 .

[5]  Raelene Wilding,et al.  Special Issue: Forced Displacement, Refugees and ICTs: Transformations of Place, Power and Social Ties , 2013 .

[6]  J. L. Benítez,et al.  Salvadoran Transnational Families: ICT and Communication Practices in the Network Society , 2012 .

[7]  Raelene Wilding,et al.  Mediating culture in transnational spaces: An example of young people from refugee backgrounds , 2012 .

[8]  Jocelyn E. Williams,et al.  Research informing practice: Toward effective engagement in community ICT in New Zealand , 2011, J. Community Informatics.

[9]  M. Nussbaum Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach , 2011 .

[10]  Nadia Caidi,et al.  Information practices of immigrants , 2010, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Tanya Notley,et al.  Young People, Online Networks, and Social Inclusion , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Raelene Wilding,et al.  Refugee youth, social inclusion, and ICTs: can good intentions go bad? , 2009, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[13]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Different spaces for e-development: What can we learn from the capability approachq , 2009 .

[14]  J. Maidment,et al.  Debating the capacity of information and communication technology to promote inclusion , 2009 .

[15]  A. Taket,et al.  Theorising Social Exclusion , 2009 .

[16]  S. Tascón Social Inclusion of Refugee Families and Children: Examples from Arts Programs in Melbourne , 2008 .

[17]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[18]  H. Horst,et al.  Return to Cyberia: technology and the social worlds of transnational migrants , 2006 .

[19]  D. Clark Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being , 2005 .

[20]  J. Urry,et al.  Social Exclusion, Mobility and Access 1 , 2005 .

[21]  I. Robeyns Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Human Development the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey , 2022 .

[22]  S. Alkire Why the Capability Approach? , 2005 .

[23]  Harry H. Hiller,et al.  New ties, old ties and lost ties: the use of the internet in diaspora , 2004, New Media Soc..

[24]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  On the Margins of the “Information Society”: A Comparative Study of Mediation , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[25]  M. Warschauer Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2003 .

[26]  R. Mansell From Digital Divides to Digital Entitlements in Knowledge Societies , 2002 .

[27]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  ‘E-stablishing’ an Inclusive Society? Technology, Social Exclusion and UK Government Policy Making , 2002, Journal of Social Policy.

[28]  Amartya Sen,et al.  India: Development and Participation , 2002 .

[29]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[30]  A. Sen,et al.  Social exclusion : concept, application, and scrutiny , 2000 .

[31]  L. Phipps NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES - A conduit for social inclusion , 2000 .

[32]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[33]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[34]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  A. Sen,et al.  Well-Being, Agency and Freedom the Dewey Lectures 1984 * , 1985 .