Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in “stable” North America with GPS

Motions of three hundred and sixty Global Positioning System (GPS) sites in Canada and the United States yield a detailed image of the vertical and horizontal velocity fields within the nominally stable interior of the North American plate. By far the strongest signal is the effect of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) due to ice mass unloading during deglaciation. Vertical velocities show present‐day uplift (∼10 mm/yr) near Hudson Bay, the site of thickest ice at the last glacial maximum. The uplift rates generally decrease with distance from Hudson Bay and change to subsidence (1–2 mm/yr) south of the Great Lakes. The “hinge line” separating uplift from subsidence is consistent with data from water level gauges along the Great Lakes, showing uplift along the northern shores and subsidence along the southern ones. Horizontal motions show outward motion from Hudson Bay with complex local variations especially in the far field. Although the vertical motions are generally consistent with the predictions of GIA models, the horizontal data illustrate the need and opportunity to improve the models via more accurate descriptions of the ice load and laterally variable mantle viscosity.

[1]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[2]  J. Andrews,et al.  The Laurentide and Innuitian ice sheets during the Last Glacial Maximum , 2002 .

[3]  R. Geller,et al.  Earthquakes along the passive margin of eastern Canada , 1979 .

[4]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Glacial rebound of the British Isles—III. Constraints on mantle viscosity , 1996 .

[5]  T. James,et al.  A comparison of VLBI data with the Ice‐3G Glacial Rebound Model , 1993 .

[6]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Gridding with continuous curvature splines in tension , 1990 .

[7]  R. Wheeler,et al.  Data for Quaternary faults, liquefaction features, and possible tectonic features in the Central and Eastern United States, east of the Rocky Mountain Front , 2000 .

[8]  J. Tromp,et al.  Influence of lithospheric thickness variations on 3‐D crustal velocities due to glacial isostatic adjustment , 2005 .

[9]  W. Peltier.  GLOBAL GLACIAL ISOSTASY AND THE SURFACE OF THE ICE-AGE EARTH: The ICE-5G (VM2) Model and GRACE , 2004 .

[10]  I. Shapiro,et al.  Constraining proposed combinations of ice history and earth rheology using VLBI determined baseline length rates in North America , 1993 .

[11]  M. Watkins,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment observed using very long baseline interferometry and satellite laser ranging geodesy , 1999 .

[12]  S. Mazzotti,et al.  Rates and uncertainties on seismic moment and deformation in eastern Canada , 2005 .

[13]  Lev Tarasov,et al.  A geophysically constrained large ensemble analysis of the deglacial history of the North American ice-sheet complex , 2004 .

[14]  T. James,et al.  GPS crustal strain, postglacial rebound, and seismic hazard in eastern North America: The Saint Lawrence valley example , 2005 .

[15]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  REVEL: A model for Recent plate velocities from space geodesy , 2002 .

[16]  M. Craymer,et al.  Present-day tilting of the Great Lakes region based on water level gauges , 2005 .

[17]  K. Larson,et al.  Measuring postglacial rebound with GPS and absolute gravity , 2000 .

[18]  W. R. Peltier,et al.  Postglacial variations in the level of the sea: Implications for climate dynamics and solid‐Earth geophysics , 1998 .

[19]  S. Lee,et al.  Thermal structure of the North American uppermost mantle inferred from seismic tomography , 2002 .

[20]  T. James,et al.  New constraints on Laurentide postglacial rebound from absolute gravity measurements , 2001 .

[21]  Donald L. Turcotte,et al.  Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets , 2001 .

[22]  D. Wolf,et al.  Deglacial land emergence and lateral upper-mantle heterogeneity in the Svalbard Archipelago—II. Extended results for high-resolution load models , 1996 .

[23]  J. Johansson,et al.  Space-Geodetic Constraints on Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Fennoscandia , 2001, Science.

[24]  W. Wal,et al.  Postglacial sealevels on a spherical, self-gravitating viscoelastic earth: effects of lateral viscosity variations in the upper mantle on the inference of viscosity contrasts in the lower mantle , 2003 .

[25]  J. Nocquet,et al.  Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements , 2006 .

[26]  James L. Davis,et al.  Investigation of glacial isostatic adjustment in the northeast U.S. using GPS measurements , 2002 .

[27]  Meghan S. Miller,et al.  Present‐day motion of the Sierra Nevada block and some tectonic implications for the Basin and Range province, North American Cordillera , 2000 .

[28]  J. Clague,et al.  History and isostatic effects of the last ice sheet in southern British Columbia , 2002 .

[29]  S. Stein,et al.  Passive Margin Earthquakes, Stresses and Rheology , 1989 .

[30]  P. Johnston,et al.  Can deglaciation trigger earthquakes in N. America? , 2000 .

[31]  A. S. Dykea,et al.  The Laurentide and Innuitian ice sheets during the Last Glacial Maximum , 2001 .

[32]  P. Basham,et al.  Earthquakes at North-Atlantic passive margins : neotectonics and postglacial rebound , 1989 .

[33]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  Lateral variation in upper mantle viscosity: role of water , 2004 .

[34]  G. Milne.  Space-geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment , 2001 .

[35]  T. Dixon,et al.  Noise in GPS coordinate time series , 1999 .

[36]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  IGS reference frames: status and future improvements , 2004 .

[37]  T. James,et al.  A comparison of eastern North American seismic strain-rates to glacial rebound strain-rates , 1994 .

[38]  M. Zoback,et al.  Did deglaciation trigger intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid seismic zone , 2001 .

[39]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Near-field hydro-isostasy: the implementation of a revised sea-level equation , 1999 .

[40]  W. Peltier,et al.  ICE-3G: A new global model of late Pleistocene deglaciation based upon geophysical predictions of po , 1991 .

[41]  W. Peltier,et al.  Ice Age Paleotopography , 1994, Science.

[42]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[43]  W. Peltier.  Global glacial isostatic adjustment: palaeogeodetic and space‐geodetic tests of the ICE‐4G (VM2) model , 2002 .

[44]  A space geodetic target for mantle viscosity discrimination: Horizontal motions induced by glacial isostatic adjustment , 1998 .

[45]  S. Pagiatakis,et al.  Historical relative gravity observations and the time rate of change of gravity due to postglacial rebound and other tectonic movements in Canada , 2003 .