The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives.

'Drought' has many meanings in relation to crop production. These range from: statistical (say, the lowest decile of annual rainfall) to a meteorologist; through yield being limited by too little water to an agronomist; to sudden severe water deficits to many molecular biologists. To a farmer, the corresponding management issues, respectively, are risk management (how best to manage a meteorologically drought-prone farm over several years), how best to match cultivar and agronomic operations to the developing growing season, and how best to minimize possible major damage to (say) floral fertility induced by severe water deficits during flowering. All these definitions and the issues they imply are relevant to improving crop production when water is limiting. How can scientists best help? The answers depend on the scales (temporal and spatial) being addressed. Agronomists and breeders, interacting, can help improve components of seasonal water balance in the field, for example, minimizing evaporative losses from the soil surface by better matching the development of a crop to its environment. Physiologists, biochemists, and molecular biologists can help by identifying ways of improving the competence of particular organs. A promising target is floral infertility resulting from water deficits, which results from lesions in tissue, and cellular and molecular processes. Choosing problems whose solutions will have implications in the field and be attractive to farmers requires knowledge of what is important in the field.

[1]  D. W. Meinig.  On the margins of the good earth , 1962 .

[2]  N. Turner,et al.  Plant Productivity in the Arid and Semiarid Zones , 1978 .

[3]  Physiology Passioura,et al.  Accountability, Philosophy and Plant , 1979 .

[4]  R. Fischer.  Growth and water limitation to dryland wheat yield in Australia: a physiological framework [review]. , 1979 .

[5]  R. Richards.  Crop improvement for temperate Australia: Future opportunities , 1991 .

[6]  Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation , 1997 .

[7]  Mark E. Westgate,et al.  Reproductive Development in Grain Crops during Drought , 1999 .

[8]  J. Rockström,et al.  Semiarid Crop Production from a Hydrological Perspective: Gap between Potential and Actual Yields , 2000 .

[9]  Oliver Rackham,et al.  The Nature of Mediterranean Europe: An Ecological History , 2001 .

[10]  J. Passioura,et al.  Review: Environmental biology and crop improvement. , 2002, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[11]  R. Richards,et al.  Breeding Opportunities for Increasing the Efficiency of Water Use and Crop Yield in Temperate Cereals. , 2002, Crop science.

[12]  J. Pereira,et al.  Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[13]  A. Blum,et al.  Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation , 2004, Euphytica.

[14]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry , 2004 .

[15]  J. Dubcovsky,et al.  A cluster of 11 CBF transcription factors is located at the frost tolerance locus Fr-Am2 in Triticum monococcum , 2006, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[16]  B. Cohen.  Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s , 2005 .

[17]  J. Passioura,et al.  Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce--from breeding to field management , 2006 .

[18]  John Angus,et al.  Benchmarking water-use efficiency of rainfed wheat in dry environments , 2006 .

[19]  J. Ferrio,et al.  The historical perspective of dryland agriculture: lessons learned from 10,000 years of wheat cultivation. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[20]  Greg J. Rebetzke,et al.  Genotypic increases in coleoptile length improves stand establishment, vigour and grain yield of deep-sown wheat , 2007 .

[21]  Guan Yongsheng,et al.  Whole plant responses, key processes, and adaptation to drought stress: the case of rice. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.