Gradient Boosted Trees Predictive Models for Surface Roughness in High-Speed Milling in the Steel and Aluminum Metalworking Industry

High-speed machining is a technique that maintains a high interest in the manufacture of metal parts for the excellent results it provides, both in surface finish and in economic benefits. In the industry, the tendency is to incorporate data management and analysis techniques to generate information that helps improve the surface roughness results in machining. A good alternative to improve the surface quality results in the manufacture of metal parts is using predictive models of the surface roughness. In this document, we present work done with experimental data obtained from two high-speed machining (HSM) machines with different types of tools and cutting conditions, conducted under an experimental design with interest in three of factors commonly studied to generate surface roughness models: tool characteristics, cutting conditions, and characteristics of the machined material. Steel and aluminum alloys were used in the experimentation. The results are contrasted with prior experiences that use the same experimental design but with different soft computing techniques and they are also contrasted with the results of similar previous works. Our results show accuracies ranging from 61.54% to 88.51% on the datasets, which are competitive results when compared with the other approaches. We also find the axial cut-depth is the most influential feature for the slots datasets and the hardness and diameter of the cutting tool are the most influential features for the geometries datasets.

[1]  Bin Zou,et al.  Tool damage and its effect on the machined surface roughness in high-speed face milling the 17-4PH stainless steel , 2016 .

[2]  R. Liebich,et al.  Impact detection using a machine learning approach and experimental road roughness classification , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[3]  S. P. L. Kumar Experimental investigations and empirical modeling for optimization of surface roughness and machining time parameters in micro end milling using Genetic Algorithm , 2018 .

[4]  D. Bajić,et al.  Regression analysis, support vector machines, and Bayesian neural network approaches to modeling surface roughness in face milling , 2009 .

[5]  Vladimir Pucovsky,et al.  Application of fuzzy logic and regression analysis for modeling surface roughness in face milliing , 2013, J. Intell. Manuf..

[6]  D. Yu. Pimenov,et al.  Experimental research of face mill wear effect to flat surface roughness , 2014 .

[7]  Manfred Weck,et al.  Chatter Stability of Metal Cutting and Grinding , 2004 .

[8]  Aitzol Lamikiz,et al.  Analysis of the Influence of the Use of Cutting Fluid in Hybrid Processes of Machining and Laser Metal Deposition (LMD) , 2018 .

[9]  Tsendsuren Munkhdalai,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Machine-Learning Methods on Bank Client Credit Assessments , 2019, Sustainability.

[10]  Reza Teimouri,et al.  Investigation of lubricant condition and machining parameters while turning of AISI 4340 , 2015 .

[11]  Bin Zou,et al.  Feasibility study of taking high-speed dry milling as the final manufacturing process by the standard of service performance , 2018 .

[12]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[13]  Brian Boswell,et al.  A review identifying the effectiveness of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) during conventional machining , 2017 .

[14]  Shyam Visweswaran,et al.  Learning Instance-Specific Predictive Models , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Concha Bielza,et al.  A Bayesian network model for surface roughness prediction in the machining process , 2008, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[16]  Andrés Bustillo,et al.  Semi-supervised roughness prediction with partly unlabeled vibration data streams , 2018, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[17]  M. Brezocnik,et al.  Prediction of surface roughness in the ball-end milling process using response surface methodology, genetic algorithms, and grey wolf optimizer algorithm , 2018 .

[18]  F. Xue,et al.  Effect of machining on the stress corrosion cracking behavior in boiling magnesium chloride solution of austenitic stainless steel , 2018 .

[19]  A. Sahoo,et al.  Comparative machinability performance of heat treated 4340 Steel under dry and minimum quantity lubrication surroundings , 2018 .

[20]  Andrés Bustillo,et al.  Using artificial intelligence to predict surface roughness in deep drilling of steel components , 2011, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[21]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Tool Design, Tool Wear and Tool Life , 2009 .

[22]  Rui Liu,et al.  Application of audible sound signals for tool wear monitoring using machine learning techniques in end milling , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[23]  Tae Jo Ko,et al.  On-machine measurement using a noncontact sensor based on a CAD model , 2007 .

[24]  R. Pawade,et al.  Comparative Study of Part Characteristics Built Using Additive Manufacturing (FDM) , 2018 .

[25]  Peihua Gu,et al.  Experimental investigation and multi-objective optimization approach for low-carbon milling operation of aluminum , 2017, Sustainable Manufacturing and Remanufacturing Management.

[26]  Guillem Quintana,et al.  Avoiding neural network fine tuning by using ensemble learning: application to ball-end milling operations , 2011 .

[27]  Juan José Rodríguez Diez,et al.  Online breakage detection of multitooth tools using classifier ensembles for imbalanced data , 2014, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[28]  Ryan E. Grant,et al.  Program optimizations: The interplay between power, performance, and energy , 2016, Parallel Comput..

[29]  N. R. Dhar,et al.  Effect of time-controlled MQL pulsing on surface roughness in hard turning by statistical analysis and artificial neural network , 2017 .

[30]  Susan E. Cozzens,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development , 2011 .

[31]  B. B. Biswal,et al.  Comparative Assessment on Machinability Aspects of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel Using Uncoated Carbide and Coated Cermet Inserts During Hard Turning , 2016 .

[32]  Y. Shrivastava,et al.  Stable cutting zone prediction in CNC turning using adaptive signal processing technique merged with artificial neural network and multi-objective genetic algorithm , 2018, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids.

[33]  Arnaud Duchosal,et al.  Minimum quantity lubrication advantages when applied to insert flank face in milling , 2017 .

[34]  C. N. Liu,et al.  Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[35]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Experimental study on fracture mechanism transformation in chip segmentation of Ti-6Al-4V alloys during high-speed machining , 2018, Journal of Materials Processing Technology.

[36]  Maritza Correa,et al.  Modelo Pre-Proceso de predicción de la Calidad Superficial en Fresado a Alta Velocidad basado en Softcomputing , 2011 .

[37]  George-Christopher Vosniakos,et al.  Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review , 2003 .

[38]  Chen Zhitong,et al.  Influence of cutting speed and tool wear on the surface integrity of the titanium alloy Ti-1023 during milling , 2015 .

[39]  Andrés Bustillo,et al.  Artificial intelligence for automatic prediction of required surface roughness by monitoring wear on face mill teeth , 2017, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.