Performance of Able-Bodied Subjects on a Text-Typing Task Using a Head-Operated Device and Expanded Membrane Cursor Keys

Children and adults with disabilities frequently rely on computers to complete written tasks. Those with significant motor limitations typically use alternative computer-input devices since the traditional keyboard and mouse are insufficient to accommodate their abilities. For persons unable to isolate their fingers, input devices controlled by movements of the head or whole hand or arm movements may be among the options considered. This study investigated the performance of a head-operated device and expanded membrane cursor keys for text entry. Data from 24 young adults indicated the head-operated device performed significantly faster given reduced cognitive demands for device operation, increased stimulus–response compatibility, and simplicity of movement. Use of the expanded membrane cursor keys resulted in significantly lower error rates. No significant differences in comfort or ease of use were reported for the two devices. The relative performance of device options for users sharing similar motor challenges provides rehabilitation specialists with important clinical information.

[1]  E M Kanny,et al.  A pilot study comparing mouse and mouse-emulating interface devices for graphic input. , 1991, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[2]  A Krueger,et al.  Computer Use, Computer Training, and Employment: Outcomes Among People With Spinal Cord Injuries , 1996, Spine.

[3]  R W Christina,et al.  The 1991 C. H. McCloy Research Lecture: unraveling the mystery of the response complexity effect in skilled movements. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[4]  F. P. Roth,et al.  Investing in emergent literacy intervention: a key role for speech-language pathologists. , 2001, Seminars in Speech and Language.

[5]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  M L Lin,et al.  Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[7]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices , 1991, TOIS.

[8]  M. Hollingsworth Computing Technologies: A Cornerstone for Educational and Employment Equity , 1992 .

[9]  Hiroshi Sekiya,et al.  Movement variability as a function of accuracy demand in programmed serial aiming responses , 1995 .

[10]  J Weisman,et al.  Comparing three head-pointing systems using a single subject design. , 1991, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[11]  J G Zato,et al.  Computer access for people with motor disabilities , 1992, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[12]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  C. Fichten,et al.  What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: recommendations based on Canadian empirical data , 2000, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[14]  J. L. Durfee,et al.  A comparison of two computer input devices for uppercase letter matching. , 1999, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[15]  C Lau,et al.  Comparison of computer interface devices for persons with severe physical disabilities. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[16]  A Whitefield Human factors aspects of pointing as an input technique in interactive computer systems. , 1986, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  J Deitz,et al.  A comparison of two computer access systems for functional text entry. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[18]  Y Gillette Pictures to Print: A Software Scaffold to Written Literacy , 2001, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[19]  S L Day,et al.  Assistive Technology For Postsecondary Students With Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.