Technology push and demand pull practices for achieving sustainable development in manufacturing industries

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the significance of various technology push (TP) and demand pull (DP) practices substantial for achieving sustainable development in Indian manufacturing industries. The research crucially examines the effectiveness of TP-DP practices in manufacturing companies. Design/methodology/approach An extensive survey of 92 companies in India has been executed to identify improvements made by TP-DP practices, to achieve sustainable development in manufacturing industries. The companies in the survey include medium- and large-scale manufacturing enterprises. The correlations between various TP-DP practices and sustainable development parameters are evaluated and validated using various numerical methods and tools. Findings The focus of the paper is on the distinguishable contributions made by TP-DP practices like innovative capability, research and development, corporate strategy, export orientation, stringent implementation of government regulations, transforming capabilities, unionized labor and customer attributes toward achieving sustainable development in manufacturing industries. The inter-relationships between different TP-DP practices with sustainable development parameters are evaluated to effectively manage the goals and objectives of industries related to sustainability and growth. However, it is also acknowledged that manufacturing firms need to work more actively on managing certain practices of TP-DP. Research limitations/implications In the present investigation, contributions made by TP-DP practices are evaluated to accomplish sustainable development in Indian manufacturing industries. Hence, the results obtained may need some modifications before applying to other countries. Moreover, issue-wise independent modeling can also be performed to assess the importance of TP-DP practices under specific orientations. Practical implications The research gives priority to enhancement in the planning among various TP-DP practices and sustainable development indicators in the industries, to impart TP-DP as important practices to meet the challenges of competent markets worldwide. Social implications It has been exhibited from the observations that adequate TP-DP practices can efficiently contribute toward recognition of sustainable development to compete in the highly progressive global market. The results of various inter-relationships among TP-DP practices and sustainable development parameters represent the effectiveness of TP-DP practices for accomplishment of social as well as organizational objectives. Originality/value The investigation shows that TP-DP practices are significant initiatives employed by the manufacturing industries for performance improvement and sustainable development. The paper peeks into the research to find out TP-DP issues that need to be assessed efficiently by companies to avail the benefits of sustainable development to meet the challenges posed by international markets.

[1]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Toward meta research on technology transfer , 1992 .

[2]  Shyam R. Chidamber,et al.  A Research Retrospective of Innovation Inception and Success: The Technology-Push Demand-Pull Question , 2018 .

[3]  T. Foxon,et al.  'Demand pull' government policies to support product-service system activity: the case of energy service companies (ESCos) in the UK , 2015 .

[4]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter? , 2012 .

[5]  G. Nemet.  Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change , 2009 .

[6]  Exploring the role of business in society , 2011 .

[7]  Alexander Brem,et al.  Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry , 2009 .

[8]  K. Platts,et al.  Market‐pull and technology‐push in manufacturing start‐ups in emerging industries , 2012 .

[9]  Colin Herron,et al.  A methodology for developing sustainable quantifiable productivity improvement in manufacturing companies , 2006 .

[10]  Hyundo Choi,et al.  Technology-push and demand-pull factors in emerging sectors: evidence from the electric vehicle market , 2018 .

[11]  Richard Walker.  The hidden dimension of industrialization: An expanding division of labour , 1993 .

[12]  Nebil Buyurgan,et al.  Application of the analytical hierarchy process for real-time scheduling and part routing in advanced manufacturing systems , 2008 .

[13]  A. Carsrud,et al.  Market, entrepreneurial, and technology orientations: impact on innovation and firm performance , 2017 .

[14]  Jeong-dong Lee,et al.  Measuring the Role of Technology-Push and Demand-Pull in the Dynamic Development of the Semiconductor Industry: The Case of the Global DRAM Market , 2009 .

[15]  G. D. Stefano,et al.  Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions , 2012 .

[16]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[17]  Ken Gregson.  Technology – Friend or Foe? , 1994 .

[18]  Dimitris Mourtzis,et al.  Manufacturing Systems: Skills & Competencies for the Future , 2013 .

[19]  H. Yamashina,et al.  Challenge to world‐class manufacturing , 2000 .

[20]  Lampros K. Stergioulas,et al.  Technology roadmap for the Creative Industries , 2017 .

[21]  Eddie W.L. Cheng,et al.  Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) , 2001, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[22]  Joseph Paul Martino,et al.  Technological Forecasting for Decisionmaking , 1975 .

[23]  Vic Gilgeous,et al.  A framework for manufacturing excellence , 1999 .

[24]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Technological regimes and the evolution of networks of innovators. Lessons from biotechnology and pharmaceuticals , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[25]  Jing-Wen Li,et al.  Improving the performance of job shop manufacturing with demand-pull production control by reducing set-up/processing time variability , 2003 .

[26]  Arie Halachmi,et al.  Performance measurement and government productivity , 2002 .

[27]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Claudio Boer,et al.  The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing , 2008 .

[29]  Audley Genus,et al.  Managing operations with people and technology , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[30]  Ilyong Ji,et al.  Demand-pull Technology Transfer and Needs-articulation of Users: A Preliminary Study , 2016 .

[31]  J. Albrecht,et al.  Balancing demand-pull and supply-push measures to support renewable electricity in Europe , 2015 .

[32]  John Howells,et al.  Rethinking the Market-Technology Relationship for Innovation , 1997 .

[33]  Syeda Tamkeen Fatima.  Globalization and technology adoption: evidence from emerging economies , 2017 .

[34]  Robert Bogue,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing: a critical discipline for the twenty-first century , 2014 .

[35]  C. Antonelli,et al.  Knowledge externalities and demand pull: The European evidence , 2015 .

[36]  Ali F. Farhoomand,et al.  Information technology push/pull reactions , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[37]  O. Saritas,et al.  A dynamic and adaptive scenario approach for formulating science & technology policy , 2017 .

[38]  P. Pavlou,et al.  Interactive Technologies and Retailing Strategy: A Review, Conceptual Framework and Future Research Directions , 2010 .

[39]  Kurt A. Heppard,et al.  An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation , 2003 .

[40]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Organizational adoption of open systems: a 'technology-push, need-pull' perspective , 2000, Inf. Manag..