Local Sustainable Energy Projects as part of Wider System Change; The Story of Local Projects

Climate change as a result of human activity is widely accepted around the world as one of the key threats of our age; caused by and leading to a number of social, environmental and economic factors. Many national and international laws now oblige the reduction of carbon emissions. Given that just under a quarter of the UK’s carbon emissions are from energy use in the residential sector, much attention in the UK has been focused on domestic energy efficiency refurbishment and behaviour change projects. However, energy users are often ‘locked-in’ to certain energy systems and practices as part of national sociotechnical regimes. Previous studies, however, have not explored what happens in individual, localised projects as part of system transition to sustainable energy use. This research explores this; looking at two Birmingham case studies. Each installed energy efficiency and microgeneration technologies and attempted behaviour change. In both projects a multitude of causative beliefs were found relating to both the problems that each project was trying to solve the solutions to those problems, hence the nature of success. Success was interpreted differently by different organisers, depending on their own priorities in the complex interconnected issues of energy and social sustainability in a diverse and often deprived city. The research demonstrates that in many projects there are positive outcomes, although not always the one originally hoped for. None of these successes are explicitly to do with the transition of the energy sociotechnical regime, and yet the projects do contribute to such a transition. Successful projects are more likely to be built upon, allowing systemic change over a long time. Local projects can act as a ‘step’ in this process.

[1]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[2]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[3]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[4]  Lambèr M. M. Royakkers,et al.  Strategic niche management of social innovations: the case of social entrepreneurship , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[6]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Economic Sociology and the Social Problem of Energy Inefficiency , 2007 .

[7]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[8]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[9]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[10]  R. Kemp,et al.  Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development , 2007 .

[11]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[12]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building , 2012 .

[13]  H. Lovell Supply and Demand for Low Energy Housing in the UK: Insights from a Science and Technology Studies Approach , 2005 .

[14]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[15]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[16]  Rob Raven,et al.  Strategic niche management for biofuels: Analysing past experiments for developing new biofuel policies , 2007 .

[17]  E. Shove Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[18]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[19]  R. Bhaskar The Possibility of Naturalism , 2014 .