A mapping of competitive priorities, manufacturing practices, and operational performance in groups of Danish manufacturing companies

A sample of 63 Danish companies is divided into four strategic groups. Each group represents a distinct manufacturing strategy. These strategic groups are then used to investigate relationships with the implementation of bundles of manufacturing practices such as JIT and TQM, and with operational performance. The results suggest that using strategic groups as a representation of companies' manufacturing strategy can improve the understanding of companies' implementation of bundles of manufacturing practices and of their operational performance. The results indicate that the degree of environmental fit differs amongst the groups and that companies do not necessarily have to conduct an extensive implementation of all bundles of manufacturing practices in order to perform well on important performance dimensions according to their manufacturing strategy. Finally, the study adds to the scarce literature on small country studies.

[1]  E. Minium Statistical reasoning in psychology and education , 1970 .

[2]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[3]  Kenneth D. Ramsing,et al.  Manufacturing in the corporate strategy , 1979 .

[4]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing , 1984 .

[5]  M. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[6]  John Bicheno,et al.  Implementing JIT: How to Cut Out Waste and Delay in Any Manufacturing Operation , 1991 .

[7]  Danny Miller,et al.  Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit , 1992 .

[8]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[9]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[10]  Cecil C. Bozarth,et al.  The impact of market requirements focus and manufacturing characteristics focus on plant performance , 1997 .

[11]  Kenneth K. Boyer Longitudinal linkages between intended and realized operations strategies , 1998 .

[12]  Christopher M. McDermott,et al.  Configurations in manufacturing strategy: a review and directions for future research , 1998 .

[13]  W. L. Berry,et al.  ALIGNING MARKETING AND MANUFACTURING STRATEGIES WITH THE MARKET , 1999 .

[14]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy , 2000 .

[15]  Ravi Kathuria Competitive priorities and managerial performance: a taxonomy of small manufacturers , 2000 .

[16]  G. S. Dangayach,et al.  Manufacturing strategy: Literature review and some issues , 2001 .

[17]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance , 2001 .

[18]  J. R. Dixon,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies revisited , 2001 .

[19]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[20]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .