Reasoning with Risk: Teaching Probability and Risk as Twin Concepts

Risk is a key aspect of life and probability is the mathematical tool to address risk. Our aim is to investigate how risk is embedded in probability and how probability can be used to solve problems of risk. Furthermore, we illustrate how risky situations are paradigmatic for the concept of probability, not least by the eminent role risk played for the emergence of probabilistic concepts. The analysis of risk forms the central section, which shows how risk is connected to probability. Decisions in risky situations draw from the various approaches to probability and from rational and behavioural views to decisions. The section on emerging concepts re-visits the development of probability and probabilistic thinking. Faced with the twin character of probability and risk, we argue that these concepts should be developed together in teaching. The conceptualisation of probability in terms of A Priori Theory (APT) Frequentist Theory (FQT) and Subjectivist Theory (SJT) forms the background to classify the pertinent constituents of the arguments. For understanding small probabilities/risks, we promote the ideas of a micromort (1 in a million chance of leading to death) and a microlife (a half-hour period, which is 1 in a million part of the average life span of a person aged 30 years).

[1]  U. Jensen Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2002 .

[2]  J. F. C. Kingman,et al.  Probability Theory: A Historical Sketch , 2014 .

[3]  Keun Ho Lee,et al.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Lower Extremity Lymphedema After Gynecologic Surgery in Ovarian Cancer , 2016, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[4]  A. Kibel Randomised prostate cancer screening trial: 20 year follow-up: Sandblom G, Varenhorst E, Rosell J, et al (Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, Sweden; Linköping Univ Hosp, Sweden; et al) BMJ 342:d1539, 2011 § , 2011 .

[5]  A. N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Foundations of the theory of probability , 1960 .

[6]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  ON THE USE AND INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN TEST CRITERIA FOR PURPOSES OF STATISTICAL INFERENCE PART I , 1928 .

[7]  David Spiegelhalter,et al.  Using speed of ageing and “microlives” to communicate the effects of lifetime habits and environment , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  M. Resnik Choices: An Introduction to Decision Theory , 1990 .

[9]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You , 2002 .

[10]  O. Löfman,et al.  Randomised prostate cancer screening trial: 20 year follow-up , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  S. Kapadia,et al.  Uncertainty in macroeconomic policy-making: art or science? , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  R. Kapadia Determinants of Decision-making in Risky situations , 2011 .

[13]  Anne S. Hawkins,et al.  Children's conceptions of probability — A psychological and pedagogical review , 1984 .

[14]  P M Todd,et al.  Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  B. D. Finetti,et al.  Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources , 1992 .

[16]  Laura Martignon,et al.  Hands-On Activities for Fourth Graders: A Tool Box for Decision-Making and Reckoning with Risk , 2009, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education.

[17]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Decision traps : ten barriers to brilliant decision-making and how to overcome them , 1989 .

[18]  Manfred Borovcnik,et al.  PROBABILISTIC AND STATISTICAL THINKING , 2005 .

[19]  Jan von Plato Creating Modern Probability by Jan von Plato , 1994 .

[20]  M. Borovcnik Risk and Decision Making: The “Logic” of Probability , 2015, The Mathematics Enthusiast.

[21]  J. Plato Creating Modern Probability: Its Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy in Historical Perspective , 1994 .

[22]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[23]  Jan von Plato Creating Modern Probability: Index of Subjects , 1994 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[25]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[26]  Dietger Heitele,et al.  An epistemological view on fundamental stochastic ideas , 1975 .

[27]  J. Hull Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[28]  J. Bermúdez Rationality, logic, and fast and frugal heuristics , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  F. N. David,et al.  Games, gods and gambling , 1963 .

[30]  Manfred Borovcnik,et al.  A Historical and Philosophical Perspective on Probability , 2014 .

[31]  R. Mises Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1919 .

[32]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  E. Çinlar Probability and Stochastics , 2011 .

[34]  G. Shafer,et al.  The significance of Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi for the philosophy of probability today , 1996 .

[35]  Manfred Borovcnik,et al.  Statistics and Probability in High School , 2016 .

[36]  Jenny Gage,et al.  What Can Education Learn from Real-World Communication of Risk and Uncertainty? , 2015, The Mathematics Enthusiast.

[37]  Probabilistic thinking and probability literacy in the context of risk Pensamento probabilístico e alfabetização em probabilidade no contexto do risco , 2016 .

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[39]  Bharath Sriraman Probabilistic Thinking: Presenting Plural Perspectives , 2014 .

[40]  Heinz Steinbring The Theoretical Nature of Probability in the Classroom , 1991 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .