Benefits and Application of Tree Structures in Gaussian Process Models to Optimize Magnetic Field Shaping Problems

Recent years have witnessed the development of powerful numerical methods to emulate realistic physical systems and their integration into the industrial product development process. Today, finite element simulations have become a standard tool to help with the design of technical products. However, when it comes to multivariate optimization, the computation power requirements of such tools can often not be met when working with classical algorithms. As a result, a lot of attention is currently given to the design of computer experiments approach. One goal of this work is the development of a sophisticated optimization process for simulation based models. Within many possible choices, Gaussian process models are most widely used as modeling approach for the simulation data. However, these models are strongly based on stationary assumptions that are often not satisfied in the underlying system. In this work, treed Gaussian process models are investigated for dealing with non-stationarities and compared to the usual modeling approach. The method is developed for and applied to the specific physical problem of the optimization of 1D magnetic linear position detection.

[1]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Bayesian Prediction of Deterministic Functions, with Applications to the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 1991 .

[2]  Robert B. Gramacy,et al.  Ja n 20 08 Bayesian Treed Gaussian Process Models with an Application to Computer Modeling , 2009 .

[3]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[4]  Michael Ortner Improving magnetic linear position measurement by field shaping , 2015, 2015 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST).

[5]  Yves Deville,et al.  DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based Metamodeling and Optimization , 2012 .

[6]  Céline Helbert,et al.  DiceDesign and DiceEval: Two R Packages for Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2015 .

[7]  C. D. Perttunen,et al.  Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant , 1993 .

[8]  C.P.O Treutler,et al.  Magnetic sensors for automotive applications , 2001 .

[9]  Thomas Hochkirchen Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments by K.-T. Fang, R. Li and A. Sudjianto , 2006 .

[10]  David M. Steinberg,et al.  Comparison of designs for computer experiments , 2006 .

[11]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Computer Experiments: Design and Analysis , 2001 .

[12]  J. M. Camacho,et al.  Alternative method to calculate the magnetic field of permanent magnets with azimuthal symmetry , 2013 .

[13]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.