A simple iterative method for estimating evapotranspiration with integrated surface/subsurface flow models

Summary This work presents an iterative, water balance based approach to estimate actual evapotranspiration (ET) with integrated surface/subsurface flow models. Traditionally, groundwater level fluctuation methods have been widely accepted and used for estimating ET and net groundwater recharge; however, in watersheds where interactions between surface and subsurface flow regimes are highly dynamic, the traditional method may be overly simplistic. Here, an innovative methodology is derived and demonstrated for using the water balance equation in conjunction with a fully-integrated surface and subsurface hydrologic model (HydroGeoSphere) in order to estimate ET at watershed and sub-watershed scales. The method invokes a simple and robust iterative numerical solution. For the proof of concept demonstrations, the method is used to estimate ET for a simple synthetic watershed and then for a real, highly-characterized 7000 km2 watershed in Southern Ontario, Canada (Grand River Watershed). The results for the Grand River Watershed show that with three to five iterations, the solution converges to a result where there is less than 1% relative error in stream flow calibration at 16 stream gauging stations. The spatially-averaged ET estimated using the iterative method shows a high level of agreement (R2 = 0.99) with that from a benchmark case simulated with an ET model embedded directly in HydroGeoSphere. The new approach presented here is applicable to any watershed that is suited for integrated surface water/groundwater flow modelling and where spatially-averaged ET estimates are useful for calibrating modelled stream discharge.

[1]  Xiuping Li,et al.  Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimates for two river basins on the Tibetan Plateau by a water balance method , 2013 .

[2]  R. Maxwell,et al.  The groundwater land-surface atmosphere connection: Soil moisture effects on the atmospheric boundary layer in fully-coupled simulations , 2007 .

[3]  W. Robertson,et al.  Artificial Sweeteners in a Large Septic Plume , 2011 .

[4]  David C. Goodrich,et al.  An integrated modelling framework of catchment‐scale ecohydrological processes: 1. Model description and tests over an energy‐limited watershed , 2014 .

[5]  W. Wallender,et al.  Calibration of an evapotranspiration model to simulate soil water dynamics in a semiarid rangeland , 2008 .

[6]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  Elements of physical hydrology , 2014 .

[7]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model , 2006 .

[8]  R. McCuen.  Hydrologic Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[9]  Li Li,et al.  Assessment of the internal dynamics of the Australian Water Balance Model under different calibration regimes , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  K. Loague,et al.  Hydrologic‐Response simulations for the R‐5 catchment with a comprehensive physics‐based model , 2001 .

[11]  Keith Beven,et al.  Spatial and temporal predictions of soil moisture dynamics, runoff, variable source areas and evapotranspiration for plynlimon, mid-wales. , 1993 .

[12]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Basin scale estimates of evapotranspiration using GRACE and other observations , 2004 .

[13]  Keith Loague,et al.  Physics‐based hydrologic‐response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality , 2006 .

[14]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[15]  Edwin T. Engman,et al.  Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff , 1983 .

[16]  B. Kløve,et al.  Fully integrated surface–subsurface flow modelling of groundwater–lake interaction in an esker aquifer: Model verification with stable isotopes and airborne thermal imaging , 2015 .

[17]  J. A. Tolk,et al.  ET mapping for agricultural water management: present status and challenges , 2008, Irrigation Science.

[18]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Irrigation scheduling performance by evapotranspiration-based controllers , 2010 .

[19]  M. Dastorani,et al.  Evaluation of Water Balance in a Mountainous Upland Catchment Using SEBAL Approach , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[20]  K. Kristensen,et al.  A MODEL FOR ESTIMATING ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1975 .

[21]  Reed M. Maxwell,et al.  Feedbacks between managed irrigation and water availability: Diagnosing temporal and spatial patterns using an integrated hydrologic model , 2014 .

[22]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Hydrological effects of forest transpiration loss in bark beetle-impacted watersheds , 2014 .

[23]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  The potential for satellite-based monitoring of groundwater storage changes using GRACE: the High Plains aquifer, Central US , 2002 .

[24]  Erin D. Zoski,et al.  Tile Drainage Management Influences on Surface-Water and Groundwater Quality following Liquid Manure Application. , 2013, Journal of environmental quality.

[25]  E. Sudicky,et al.  Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model , 2008 .

[26]  O. Kolditz,et al.  A coupled surface/subsurface flow model accounting for air entrapment and air pressure counterflow , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[27]  T. Poiger,et al.  Ubiquitous occurrence of the artificial sweetener acesulfame in the aquatic environment: an ideal chemical marker of domestic wastewater in groundwater. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Z. Su,et al.  Surface–groundwater interactions in hard rocks in Sardon Catchment of western Spain: An integrated modeling approach , 2014 .

[29]  David W. Rassam,et al.  Accounting for surface-groundwater interactions and their uncertainty in river and groundwater models: A case study in the Namoi River, Australia , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  S. Schiff,et al.  Persistence of artificial sweeteners in a 15-year-old septic system plume , 2013 .

[31]  Young-Jin Park,et al.  Simulating the pre-development hydrologic conditions in the San Joaquin Valley, California , 2011 .

[32]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  A hydraulic mixing-cell method to quantify the groundwater component of streamflow within spatially distributed fully integrated surface water-groundwater flow models , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  René Therrien,et al.  Simulating coupled surface and subsurface water flow in a tile-drained agricultural catchment , 2015 .

[34]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[35]  P. Huyakorn,et al.  A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow , 2004 .

[36]  Olaf A. Cirpka,et al.  Simulating the transition of a semi-arid rainfed catchment towards irrigation agriculture , 2011 .

[37]  J. Hélie,et al.  Synoptic and time-series stable isotope surveys of the Mackenzie River from Great Slave Lake to the Arctic Ocean, 2003 to 2006 , 2010 .

[38]  H. Fowler,et al.  Large scale surface – subsurface hydrological model to assess climate change impacts on groundwater reserves , 2009 .

[39]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  A parallel computational framework to solve flow and transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..