A State-Based Analysis of Public Health Preparedness Programs in the United States

Objectives. Given the national effort to respond to the challenge of terrorism post-9/11, this study examined the organizational structure of state public health preparedness programs across the country, their administration, and the personnel and resources supported through federal cooperative agreements and state funds. Methods. In Fall 2004, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials surveyed state public health preparedness directors of all 50 states and territories of the United States regarding the organizational structure, administration, personnel, and resources of the state public health preparedness programs. Results. Individuals representing 45 states and the District of Columbia responded to the web-based questionnaire for a response rate of 88.2%. States tended to subdivide their organizations into regions for preparedness purposes. More than half the established preparedness regions (53.8%) were created post-9/11. Preparedness program directors frequently reported directly to either the state health official (40.0%) or a deputy state health official (33.3%). Responsibility for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) cooperative agreements was predominantly vested in one person (73.3%). Federal resources were found to support needed preparedness workforce (CDC mean=117.1 full-time equivalents [FTEs]; HRSA mean=10.6 FTEs). In addition, 36.6% of the states also contributed to the public health preparedness budget. Conclusions. This study of state public health agency preparedness provides new information about state-level organizational structure, administration, and support of preparedness programs. It offers the first comprehensive insights into the approaches states have adopted to build infrastructure and develop capacity through CDC and HRSA funding streams.

[1]  M. Osterholm,et al.  Preparing for the next pandemic. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Structure and functions of state public health agencies. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[3]  Brenda L. Elledge,et al.  Are public health workers aware of what they don't know? , 2005, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[4]  David Blythe,et al.  Pandemic influenza preparedness in Maryland: improving readiness through a tabletop exercise. , 2005, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[5]  Michael W. Brand,et al.  Self-Assessment in the Measurement of Public Health Workforce Preparedness for Bioterrorism or other Public Health Disasters , 2005, Public health reports.

[6]  Danilea Werner,et al.  An Innovation in Partnership among First Responders and Public Health: Bridging the Gap , 2005, Public health reports.

[7]  H. Burns,et al.  Cross-Sector Leadership Development for Preparedness , 2005, Public health reports.

[8]  Mary V. Davis,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Public Health Workforce Training Needs Assessment Survey in North Carolina , 2005, Public health reports.

[9]  Melissa Alperin,et al.  The MACH Model: From Competencies to Instruction and Performance of the Public Health Workforce , 2005, Public health reports.

[10]  J. Calhoun,et al.  Competency Mapping and Analysis for Public Health Preparedness Training Initiatives , 2005, Public health reports.

[11]  Michael W. Brand,et al.  Partnering for Preparedness: The Project Public Health Ready Experience , 2005, Public health reports.

[12]  N Clay Mann,et al.  Public Health Preparedness for Mass-Casualty Events: A 2002 State-by-State Assessment , 2004, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[13]  M. Stoto,et al.  Local variation in public health preparedness: lessons from California. , 2004, Health affairs.

[14]  Elin A. Gursky,et al.  Drafted to Fight Terror U.S. Public Health on the Front Lines of Biological Defense , 2004 .

[15]  S. Lawrence,et al.  Bioterrorism risk perceptions and educational needs of public health professionals before and after September 11, 2001: a national needs assessment survey. , 2004, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[16]  M. Stoto,et al.  Gaps in Public Health Preparedness: Lessons Learned in California , 2004 .

[17]  B. Turnock.  Roadmap for public health workforce preparedness. , 2003, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[18]  F. Burkle.  Measures of Effectiveness in Large-scale Bioterrorism Events , 2003, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[19]  M. Potter,et al.  A model for public health workforce development using the National Public Health Performance Standards Program. , 2003, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[20]  J. Małecki,et al.  Need for physicians trained in preventive medicine and public health: implications for a bioterrorism response. , 2003, Journal of Public Health Management and Practice.

[21]  P. Quinlisk,et al.  Terrorism preparedness in state health departments--United States, 2001-2003. , 2003, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[22]  Thomas V Inglesby,et al.  Anthrax 2001: observations on the medical and public health response. , 2003, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[23]  J. Merrill,et al.  Public health worker competencies for emergency response. , 2002, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[24]  Lois M. Davis,et al.  Issue Paper: Are Local Health Responders Ready for Biological and Chemical Terrorism? , 2002 .

[25]  A. Spake.  Confusion in spades. The anthrax scares reveal a public-health system in disarray. , 2001, U.S. news & world report.

[26]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[27]  Vol XXVmI,et al.  Public Health Reports , 1941, The Indian medical gazette.