Why “What Data Are Necessary for This Project?” and Other Basic Questions are Important to Address in Public Health Informatics Practice and Research

Despite the likelihood of poor quality data flowing from clinical information systems to public health information systems, current policies and practices are pushing for the adoption and use of even greater numbers of electronic data feeds. However, using poor data can lead to poor decision-making outcomes in public health. Therefore public health informatics professionals need to assess, and periodically re-evaluate, the quality of electronic data and their sources. Unfortunately there is currently a paucity of tools and strategies in use across public health agencies. Our Center of Excellence in Public Health Informatics is working to develop and disseminate tools and strategies for supporting on-going assessment of data quality and solutions for overcoming data quality challenges. In this article, we outline the need for better data quality assessment and our approach to the development of new tools and strategies. In other words, public health informatics professionals need to ask questions about the electronic data received by public health agencies, and we hope to create tools and strategies to help informaticians ask questions that will lead to improved population health outcomes.

[1]  Daniel J. Vreeman.  Keeping Up with Changing Source System Terms in a Local Health Information Infrastructure: Running to Stand Still , 2007, MedInfo.

[2]  M. Prietula,et al.  Situational uses of syndromic surveillance. , 2009, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[3]  Ben Y. Reis,et al.  Syndromic surveillance: the effects of syndrome grouping on model accuracy and outbreak detection. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  William B. Lober,et al.  Roundtable on bioterrorism detection: information system-based surveillance. , 2002, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[5]  Russ P Lopez.  Disease Surveillance: A Public Health Informatics Approach , 2007 .

[6]  Neil E Harl,et al.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 , 2009 .

[7]  Thomas Redman,et al.  The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise , 1998, CACM.

[8]  Michael M. Wagner,et al.  Review: Accuracy of Data in Computer-based Patient Records , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Wendy W Chapman,et al.  Classification of emergency department chief complaints into 7 syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 527,228 patients. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  Francisco Inácio Bastos,et al.  Disease Surveillance: A Public Health Informatics Approach , 2007 .

[11]  R. Platt,et al.  Using automated medical records for rapid identification of illness syndromes (syndromic surveillance): the example of lower respiratory infection , 2001, BMC public health.

[12]  Rema Padman,et al.  Analyzing the Effect of Data Quality on the Accuracy of Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Computer Simulation Approach , 2006, AMIA.

[13]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[14]  Tracee Treadwell,et al.  The validity of chief complaint and discharge diagnosis in emergency department-based syndromic surveillance. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[15]  Perry L. Miller,et al.  Research Paper: Exploring the Degree of Concordance of Coded and Textual Data in Answering Clinical Queries from a Clinical Data Repository , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Daniel J. Vreeman,et al.  Embracing Change in a Health Information Exchange , 2008, AMIA.

[17]  Julie J McGowan,et al.  Electronic laboratory data quality and the value of a health information exchange to support public health reporting processes. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[18]  P. Effler,et al.  Statewide system of electronic notifiable disease reporting from clinical laboratories: comparing automated reporting with conventional methods. , 1999, JAMA.

[19]  F. Hasson,et al.  A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. , 2001, International journal of nursing studies.

[20]  M. Jaana,et al.  Prioritizing the Risk Factors Influencing the Success of Clinical Information System Projects , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[21]  J. Crisp,et al.  The Delphi method? , 1997, Nursing research.

[22]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making Assessing the Level of Healthcare Information Technology Adoption in the United States: a Snapshot , 2005 .

[23]  S. Groseclose,et al.  Completeness of notifiable infectious disease reporting in the United States: an analytical literature review. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  J. Glenn,et al.  The Millennium Project , 1990 .

[25]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..