Comparison between laser scanning tomography and computerised image analysis of the optic disc

AIMS To study the interchangeability of the measurements of the optic disc topography obtained by one computerised image analyser and one confocal laser tomographic scanner. METHODS One eye of 28 patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspects was studied. All cases had simultaneous stereoscopic disc photographs taken with the fundus camera Topcon TRC-SS and optic disc examination with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) during the same visit. The optic disc photographs were digitised and analysed with the Topcon ImageNet (TI) system. Three variables of the optic disc topography provided by the TI and the HRT were compared—cup volume (CV), rim area (RA), and cup area to disc area ratio (CA/DA). RESULTS The mean values of CV and RA provided by the TI (0.52 (SD 0.32) mm3and 1.58 (0.39) mm2, respectively) were greater (p<0.01) than the mean values of CV and RA determined by the HRT (0.32 (0.25) mm3, and 1.33 (0.47) mm2, respectively). The mean value of CA/DA provided by the TI (0.42 (0.14)) and the HRT (0.42 (0.18)) was similar (p=0.93). Correlation coefficients between measurements obtained by the two methods ranged from 0.53 to 0.73. CONCLUSION There was a significant discrepancy in the measurements of rim area and cup volume of the optic disc obtained by a computerised image analyser and a laser scanning tomograph.

[1]  R Varma,et al.  Agreement between clinicians and an image analyzer in estimating cup-to-disc ratios. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  G A Cioffi,et al.  Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Sommer,et al.  Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  R N Weinreb,et al.  Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  L. Dandona,et al.  Variability of depth measurements of the optic nerve head and peripapillary retina with computerized image analysis. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  A. Sommer,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Varma,et al.  Comparison of clinician judgment with digitized image analysis in the detection of induced optic disk change in monkey eyes. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Varma,et al.  A comparative evaluation of three methods of analyzing optic disc topography. , 1989, Ophthalmic surgery.

[9]  P J Airaksinen,et al.  The correlation between cup-disk ratio, neuroretinal rim area, and optic disk area measured by the video-ophthalmograph (Rodenstock analyzer) and clinical measurement. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  R Varma,et al.  The PAR IS 2000: a new system for retinal digital image analysis. , 1988, Ophthalmic surgery.

[11]  R N Weinreb,et al.  Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  Augusto Azuara-Blanco,et al.  Reproducibility of Optic Disk Topographic Measurements with the Topcon ImageNet and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph , 1998, Ophthalmologica.

[13]  A E Maumenee,et al.  Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  P. Lichter.  Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. , 1976, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[15]  J. Jonas,et al.  Comparison between tomographic scanning evaluation and photographic measurement of the neuroretinal rim. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  A Sommer,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Detection of Glaucomatous Progression of the Optic Disc , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[17]  H. Littmann.  [Determination of the real size of an object on the fundus of the living eye]. , 1982, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.