Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom

Bone density measurement by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) commonly uses an external reference phantom to decrease scan-to-scan and scanner-to-scanner variability. However, the peripheral location of these phantoms and other phantom variables is also responsible for a measurable degradation in accuracy and precision. Due to non-uniform artifacts such as beam hardening, scatter, and volume averaging, the ideal reference phantom should be as close to the target tissue as possible. This investigation developed and tested a computer program that uses paraspinal muscle and fat tissue as internal reference standards in an effort to eliminate the need for an external phantom. Because of their proximity, these internal reference tissues can be assumed to reflect more accurately the local changes in the x-ray spectra and scatter distribution at the target tissue. A user interactive computerized histogram plotting technique enabled the derivation of reproducible CT numbers for muscle, fat, and trabecular bone. Preliminary results indicate that the use of internal reference tissues with the histogram technique may improve reproducibility of scan-to-scan measurements as well as inter-scanner precision. Reproducibility studies on 165 images with intentional region-of-interest (ROI) mispositioning of 1.5, 2.5, or 3.5 mm yielded a precision of better than 1% for normals and 1% to 2% for osteoporotic patients—a twofold improvement over the precision from similar tests using the standard technique with an external reference phantom. Such improvements in precision are essential for QCT to be clinically useful as a noninvasive modality for measurement of the very small annual changes in bone mineral density.

[1]  M. A. Davis,et al.  Bone mineral screening for osteoporosis. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Richard B. Mazess,et al.  Errors in measuring trabecular bone by computed tomography due to marrow and bone composition , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[3]  D. R. White,et al.  Tissue substitutes in experimental radiation physics. , 1978, Medical physics.

[4]  E C McCullough,et al.  Factors affecting the use of quantitative information from a CT scanner. , 1977, Radiology.

[5]  H K Genant,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. , 1985, Bone.

[6]  P. Robinson,et al.  Repositioning errors in measurement of vertebral attenuation values by computed tomography. , 1983, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  C. Cann,et al.  Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners. , 1987, Radiology.

[8]  A Hemmingsson,et al.  Dual energy computed tomography: simulated monoenergetic and material-selective imaging. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  K Imamura,et al.  Empirical beam hardening correction in the measurement of vertebral bone mineral content by computed tomography. , 1981, Radiology.

[10]  C. Cann,et al.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. , 1988, Radiology.

[11]  W R Reinus,et al.  Two postprocessing CT techniques for determining the composition of trabecular bone. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[12]  S. Chenery,et al.  Quantitative CT measurements: the effect of scatter acceptance and filter characteristics on the EMI 7070. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  N J Pelc,et al.  Nonlinear partial volume artifacts in x-ray computed tomography. , 1980, Medical physics.

[14]  W A Kalender,et al.  Vertebral bone mineral analysis: an integrated approach with CT. , 1987, Radiology.

[15]  R. A. Rutherford,et al.  Measurement of effective atomic number and electron density using an EMI scanner , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[16]  R M Neer,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision. , 1985, Investigative radiology.

[17]  H. Genant,et al.  Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography. , 1980, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  M M Goodsitt,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography scanning for measurement of bone and bone marrow fat content. A comparison of single- and dual-energy techniques using a solid synthetic phantom. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[19]  C C Glueer,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography: Update 1987 , 1987, Calcified Tissue International.

[20]  R. Mazess,et al.  Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density. , 1986, Radiology.

[21]  R. Mazess Bone density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: Thresholds and breakpoints , 1987, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  H. Skinner,et al.  CT image correction for beam hardening using simulated projection data , 1990 .

[23]  H. Genant,et al.  Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods. , 1986, Radiology.