Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) is a plasticity-inducing noninvasive brain stimulation tool with various potential therapeutic applications in neurological and psychiatric diseases. Currently, the duration of the aftereffects of stimulation is restricted. For future clinical applications, stimulation protocols are required that produce aftereffects lasting for days or weeks. Options to prolong the effects of tDCS are further prolongation or repetition of tDCS. Nothing is known thus far about optimal protocols in this behalf, although repetitive stimulation is already performed in clinical applications. Thus we explored the effects of different break durations on cathodal tDCS-induced cortical excitability alterations. In 12 subjects, two identical periods of cathodal tDCS (9-min duration; 1 mA) with an interstimulation interval of 0 (no break), 3, or 20 min or 3 or 24 h were performed. The results indicate that doubling stimulation duration without a break prolongs the aftereffects from 60 to 90 min after tDCS. When the second stimulation was performed during the aftereffects of the first, a prolongation and enhancement of tDCS-induced effects for ≤ 120 min after stimulation was observed. In contrast, when the second stimulation followed the first one after 3 or 24 h, the aftereffects were initially attenuated, or abolished, but afterwards re-established for up to 120 min after tDCS in the 24-h condition. These results suggest that, for prolonging the aftereffects of cathodal tDCS, stimulation interval might be important.

[1]  J. Ellrich,et al.  Long‐term depression of spinal nociception and pain in man: Influence of varying stimulation parameters , 2009, European journal of pain.

[2]  John R Anderson,et al.  Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[3]  W. Abraham,et al.  Metaplasticity: A new vista across the field of synaptic plasticity , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  Hubert R. Dinse,et al.  Homeostatic Metaplasticity in the Human Somatosensory Cortex , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation , 2005, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[6]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[7]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Y. Shinoda,et al.  Long‐lasting synaptic loss after repeated induction of LTD: independence to the means of LTD induction , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  M. Mizunami,et al.  Temporal determinants of long-term retention of olfactory memory in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Cognitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression , 2006, Depression and anxiety.

[11]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[12]  Y. Shinoda,et al.  Repetition of mGluR-dependent LTD causes slowly developing persistent reduction in synaptic strength accompanied by synapse elimination , 2005, Brain Research.

[13]  G. Davis.  Homeostatic control of neural activity: from phenomenology to molecular design. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. , 2008, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[15]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[17]  I. Gartside,et al.  Mechanisms of Sustained Increases of Firing Rate of Neurones in the Rat Cerebral Cortex after Polarization: Reverberating Circuits or Modification of Synaptic Conductance? , 1968, Nature.

[18]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  S. Nelson,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Anticonvulsant Effects of Transcranial Direct‐current Stimulation (tDCS) in the Rat Cortical Ramp Model of Focal Epilepsy , 2006, Epilepsia.

[21]  A. Priori,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression. , 2009, Journal of affective disorders.

[22]  P. Maquet,et al.  Early boost and slow consolidation in motor skill learning. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[23]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  E. Wassermann,et al.  Priming Stimulation Enhances the Depressant Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Y. Kim,et al.  Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory , 2008, Neuroreport.

[26]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  Ulf Ziemann,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in human motor cortex demonstrated by two consecutive sessions of paired associative stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reveals Inhibitory Deficiency In Migraine , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[30]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  Gregor Thut,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[32]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[33]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Homeostatic metaplasticity of the motor cortex is altered during headache-free intervals in migraine with aura. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  L. Pellerin,et al.  Making sense of AMPA receptor trafficking by modeling molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity , 2008, Brain Research.

[37]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Timing-Dependent Modulation of Associative Plasticity by General Network Excitability in the Human Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  Yasuo Terao,et al.  Short and long duration transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the human hand motor area , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.