Non-native phonemes in adult word learning: evidence from the N400m

Newborns are equipped with a large phonemic inventory that becomes tuned to one's native language early in life. We review and add new data about how learning of a non-native phoneme can be accomplished in adults and how the efficiency of word learning can be assessed by neurophysiological measures. For this purpose, we studied the acquisition of the voiceless, bilabial fricative /Φ/ via a statistical-learning paradigm. Phonemes were embedded in minimal pairs of pseudowords, differing only with respect to the fricative (/aΦo/ versus /afo/). During learning, pseudowords were combined with pictures of objects with some combinations of pseudowords and pictures occurring more frequently than others. Behavioural data and the N400m component, as an index of lexical activation/semantic access, showed that participants had learned to associate the pseudowords with the pictures. However, they could not discriminate within the minimal pairs. Importantly, before learning, the novel words with the sound /Φ/ showed smaller N400 amplitudes than those with native phonemes, evidencing their non-word status. Learning abolished this difference indicating that /Φ/ had become integrated into the native category /f/, instead of establishing a novel category. Our data and review demonstrate that native phonemic categories are powerful attractors hampering the mastery of non-native contrasts.

[1]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[2]  Jane Garry,et al.  Facts about the world's languages : an encyclopedia of the world's major languages, past and present , 2001 .

[3]  M. Rugg The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[4]  E. Halgren,et al.  Human medial temporal lobe potentials evoked in memory and language tasks. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Turvey,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Localizing the distributed language network responsible for the N400 measured by MEG during auditory sentence processing , 2006, Brain Research.

[7]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[8]  P. Kuhl Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  K Lehnertz,et al.  Inferior temporal stream for word processing with integrated mnemonic function , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Klaus Lehnertz,et al.  Human temporal lobe potentials in verbal learning and memory processes , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Language/Culture/Mind/Brain , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Junghöfer,et al.  Early Left-Hemispheric Dysfunction of Face Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: An MEG Study , 2008, PloS one.

[14]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  The bounds on flexibility in speech perception. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Distinctive Feature Codes in the Short-Term Memory of Children. , 1975 .

[17]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[18]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Plasticity of the human auditory cortex induced by discrimination learning of non-native, mora-timed contrasts of the Japanese language. , 2002, Learning & memory.

[19]  B. N'Kaoua,et al.  Differential involvement of the human temporal lobe structures in short- and long-term memory processes assessed by intracranial ERPs. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[20]  P. Kuhl Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Heikki Lyytinen,et al.  Cortical Activation during Spoken-Word Segmentation in Nonreading-Impaired and Dyslexic Adults , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[24]  S. Kuriki,et al.  MEG study on neural activities associated with syntactic and semantic violations in spoken Korean sentences , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[25]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual relationships between spoken words and environmental sounds: Event-related brain potential measures , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Priming in an Object Decision Task , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  M. Kutas,et al.  A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[28]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Spoken Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia: Event-related Potential Evidence for a Lexical Integration Deficit , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[30]  J Hillenbrand,et al.  Speech perception by infants: categorization based on nasal consonant place of articulation. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  First- and Second-language Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[33]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Word, Pseudoword, and Nonword Processing: A Multitask Comparison Using Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  P. Kuhl Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[38]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Five days versus a lifetime: intense associative vocabulary training generates lexically integrated words. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[39]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[40]  吉川 清隆,et al.  Perception of Speech , 1970 .

[41]  Caterina Breitenstein,et al.  Development and validation of a language learning model for behavioral and functional-imaging studies , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  R. Lasky,et al.  VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments. , 1975, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[43]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[44]  Andrew C Papanicolaou,et al.  Source localization of the N400 response in a sentence-reading paradigm using evoked magnetic fields and magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Brain Research.

[45]  M. Kutas,et al.  The Search for Common Sense: An Electrophysiological Study of the Comprehension of Words and Pictures in Reading , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  J. Kissler,et al.  Buzzwords , 2007, Psychological science.

[47]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[49]  Ruth de Diego Balaguer,et al.  First- and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon , 2006 .

[50]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[51]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon , 2005, NeuroImage.

[52]  P D Eimas,et al.  Contextual effects in infant speech perception. , 1980, Science.

[53]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-Language Speech Perception : Initial Capabilities and Developmental Change , 2001 .

[54]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[55]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Perceptual strategies in prelingual speech segmentation , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[56]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  New Names for Known Things: On the Association of Novel Word Forms with Existing Semantic Information , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  A. Friederici,et al.  First-Pass versus Second-Pass Parsing Processes in a Wernicke's and a Broca's Aphasic: Electrophysiological Evidence for a Double Dissociation , 1998, Brain and Language.

[58]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Intracellular responses of caudate neurons to brain stem stimulation. , 1970, Brain research.

[59]  陈永武 α , 1995 .

[60]  C. Petten A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .

[61]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[62]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[63]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Selective Visual Attention to Emotion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Levodopa: Faster and better word learning in normal humans , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[65]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Brain potentials to native and non-native speech contrasts in 7- and 11-month-old American infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[66]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  叶萍,et al.  β , 2002 .

[68]  Ava J. Senkfor,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation between verbal and nonverbal semantic processing in learning disabled adults , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  P. Strevens Spectra of Fricative Noise in Human Speech , 1960 .

[70]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.