Using Institutional Theory To Reframe Research on Academic Drift.

In an attempt to better understand patterns of academic drift in higher education and to demonstrate the usefulness of institutional theory as a lens through which to use these patterns, the authors examine patterns of drift in multiple higher education systems and test the concept of "isomorphism in organizational fields", as discussed in institutional theory. The authors argue that the theoretical framework provided by institutional theory presents a useful lens through which to examine and to explain why academic drift occurs in higher education systems.

[1]  V. L. Meek,et al.  The mockers and mocked : comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education , 1996 .

[2]  James S. Fairweather,et al.  Myths and realities of academic labor markets , 1995 .

[3]  Centralization and diversity: evaluating the effects of government policies in U.S.A. and Dutch higher education , 1998 .

[4]  M. Covaleski,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on the Rise, Social Transformation, and Fall of a University Budget Category. , 1988 .

[5]  V. Meek.  The transformation of Australian higher education from binary to unitary system , 1991 .

[6]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test , 1989 .

[7]  G. Neave.  Academic drift: Some views from Europe , 1979 .

[8]  R. Berdahl.  Strategy and Government: U.S. State Systems and Institutional Role and Mission. , 1985 .

[9]  D. Riesman.  Constraint and variety in American education , 1956 .

[10]  David Riesman,et al.  The Academic Revolution. , 1969 .

[11]  J. Huisman,et al.  Early and late adoption of knowledge products: Strategic or institutional behavior? , 2000 .

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[13]  Pamela S. Tolbert.  Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1985 .

[14]  Christine Oliver,et al.  The Collective Strategy Framework: An Application to Competing Predictions of Isomorphism , 1988 .

[15]  Christopher C. Morphew.  "A Rose by Any Other Name": Which Colleges Became Universities , 2002 .

[16]  P. Maassen,et al.  International Perspectives on Trends and Issues in Higher Education Policy , 1994 .

[17]  J. Lachs.  Graduate Programs in the Undergraduate College: The Arguments against Turning a College into a University , 1965 .

[18]  Frederick C. Gruber,et al.  A general pattern for American public higher education , 1963 .

[19]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[20]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Bernard Berelson,et al.  From Graduate Education in the United States , 1961 .