An Examination of Pack Journalism as a Form of Groupthink: A Theoretical and Qualitative Analysis

This study examines pack journalism as a form of groupthink. Pack journalism is a practice whereby large groups of reporters cluster around a news site, engage in copycat reporting by using and sharing news information, and lazily refrain from confirming the data through independent sources. Groupthink is a concept that describes a consensus-seeking propensity in certain groups. Through a qualitative analysis and thorough explanation of pack journalism, coupled with a theoretical and anecdotal description of groupthink, this study examines the relationships between this pack media practice and the theoretical concept of groupthink. Qualitative data were gathered from e-mail interviews with reporters from major newspaper organizations in several U.S. states. Questions asked in the interview were designed to evoke subjective journalistic opinions about what it means to engage in pack journalism, what the ethical and professional implications are from reporters' standpoints, and what connection there is between pack journalism and groupthink.

[1]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[2]  T. Crouse.  The Boys on the Bus , 1973 .

[3]  Lawrence G. Sager.  Courting disaster. , 1977, Public health.

[4]  R. Field.  Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[5]  I. Janis.  Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[6]  C. H. Germain.  Ethnography: Step By Step , 1990 .

[7]  M. West.  Controversies in Media Ethics , 1996 .

[8]  W. Feek.  Communication works. , 1996, AIDS/STD health promotion exchange.

[9]  Marc D. Street.  Groupthink , 1997 .

[10]  Kramer,et al.  Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam Decisions 25 Years Later: How Well Has the Groupthink Hypothesis Stood the Test of Time? , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[11]  B. Raven,et al.  Groupthink, Bay of Pigs, and Watergate Reconsidered. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[12]  McCauley,et al.  Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[13]  Whyte,et al.  Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[14]  Patsy Clarke,et al.  Internet as a medium for qualitative research , 2000 .

[15]  Russell Frank,et al.  `These Crowded Circumstances' , 2003 .

[16]  Kevin Wright,et al.  Assessing Communication Competence in an Online Study: Toward Informing Subsequent Interventions Among Older Adults With Cancer, Their Lay Caregivers, and Peers , 2003, Health communication.

[17]  J. Rothwell,et al.  In Mixed Company: Small Group Communication , 2003 .

[18]  David Ray Griffin,et al.  The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 , 2004 .

[19]  Nalita James,et al.  Credibility, authenticity and voice: dilemmas in online interviewing , 2006 .

[20]  Jonathan Matusitz,et al.  Unethical Consequences of Pack Journalism , 2007 .

[21]  Zoe M. Oxley,et al.  Public Opinion: Democratic Ideals, Democratic Practice , 2008 .

[22]  Shelley Kinash,et al.  Virtual ethnography: Interactive interviewing online as method , 2008 .

[23]  Jonathan Matusitz,et al.  Communicating the Negative Aspects of Pack Journalism to Media Reporters , 2008 .