Fluid–Structure Interaction Simulation of Aortic Valve Closure with Various Sinotubular Junction and Sinus Diameters

[1]  Gil Marom,et al.  Numerical model of the aortic root and valve: optimization of graft size and sinotubular junction to annulus ratio. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  K. Dellimore,et al.  Experimental validation of the fluid–structure interaction simulation of a bioprosthetic aortic heart valve , 2013, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[3]  T. David Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease , 2013, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[4]  Gil Marom,et al.  Aortic root numeric model: annulus diameter prediction of effective height and coaptation in post-aortic valve repair. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  G. D’Ancona,et al.  Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency: a review. , 2012, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[6]  S. Plein,et al.  Late dynamic right ventricular outflow obstruction after the Ross procedure for bicuspid aortic valve disease. , 2012, Circulation.

[7]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  A fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic valve with coaptation and compliant aortic root , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  Benjamin Sohmer,et al.  Modeling leaflet correction techniques in aortic valve repair: A finite element study. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Dan Zhu,et al.  Dynamic normal aortic root diameters: implications for aortic root reconstruction. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  J. Gummert,et al.  Survival Comparison of the Ross Procedure and Mechanical Valve Replacement With Optimal Self-Management Anticoagulation Therapy: Propensity-Matched Cohort Study , 2011, Circulation.

[11]  Michel R Labrosse,et al.  Structural analysis of the natural aortic valve in dynamics: from unpressurized to physiologically loaded. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Matteo Astorino,et al.  Computational analysis of an aortic valve jet with Lagrangian coherent structures. , 2010, Chaos.

[13]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Aortic root performance after valve sparing procedure: a comparative finite element analysis. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method , 2009 .

[15]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  The Ross Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2009, Circulation.

[16]  Alessandro Ricci,et al.  Sinotubular junction size affects aortic root geometry and aortic valve function in the aortic valve reimplantation procedure: an in vitro study using the Valsalva graft. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  G. Melina,et al.  An evaluation of the Ross operation in adults. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[19]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Geometric mismatch of the aortic and pulmonary roots causes aortic insufficiency after the Ross procedure. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  Michel R Labrosse,et al.  Geometric modeling of functional trileaflet aortic valves: development and clinical applications. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  Serial echocardiographic assessment of neo-aortic regurgitation and root dimensions after the modified Ross procedure. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[22]  M. Slater,et al.  Modification to the Ross procedure to prevent autograft dilatation. , 2005, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual.