Development of performance assessment tools for a highway bridge resulting from controlled progressive monitoring

As highway bridges continue to deteriorate given the increased service life, increase in vehicle demand and exposure to harsh environmental climates, new methods of monitoring their in situ performance are of high priority. Damage within the structure can alter various load demand and capacity characteristics, affecting the overall integrity of the bridge. Discussed in this paper is the monitoring of a simple span bridge superstructure under various induced damage states. Strain measurements were recorded at the midspan and north abutment of each girder. Six levels of damage progression were implemented at a rocker bearing and various diaphragms to girder connections. Transverse load distribution factors (DFs) and neutral axis (NA) locations were measured for each damage case and evaluated against the baseline undamaged response. These measurements serve to provide a possible method of damage detection using load-testing parameters already employed by various transportation agencies. Next, a performance index (PI) is developed for this stringer/multi-girder bridge utilising the NA and DF response from the steel girder system and the allowable stress design load-rating data. The ratio of NA to DF was compared to the inventory load rating for each girder at each damaged state. The data were fitted with a power regression model to form the PI. Furthermore, a 95% prediction interval was used around the predicted response to capture all the data from the testing. The model was applied to the damaged structure as well as two additional stringer/multi-girder bridges. The objective of the PI is to complement existing qualitative assessment protocols with quantitative results for improving the condition assessment process.

[1]  Michael J. Chajes,et al.  Experimental Load Rating of a Posted Bridge , 1997 .

[2]  Ashutosh Bagchi,et al.  Performance of Vibration-based Techniques for the Identification of Structural Damage , 2006 .

[3]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[4]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[5]  Harry W. Shenton,et al.  A System for In-Service Strain Monitoring of Ordinary Bridges , 2005 .

[6]  John T. DeWolf,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Continuous Strain Monitoring System on a Multi-Girder Composite Steel Bridge , 2006 .

[7]  Paul J. Barr,et al.  Nondestructive Evaluation of the I-40 Bridge over the Rio Grande River , 2004 .

[8]  Evon M. O. Abu-Taieh,et al.  Comparative Study , 2020, Definitions.

[9]  Matthew J. Whelan,et al.  Wireless Monitoring of a Multispan Bridge Superstructure for Diagnostic Load Testing and System Identification , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Yang Wang,et al.  Performance monitoring of the Geumdang Bridge using a dense network of high-resolution wireless sensors , 2006, Smart Materials and Structures.

[11]  Sung-Han Sim,et al.  Structural damage detection using static strain data , 2008 .

[12]  John T. DeWolf,et al.  Bridge Monitoring Network--Installation and Operation , 2006 .

[13]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[14]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I. Experiment , 1998 .

[15]  Asce,et al.  White Paper on Bridge Inspection and Rating , 2009 .

[16]  Harry W. Shenton,et al.  Long-term health monitoring of an advanced polymer composite bridge , 1999, Smart Structures.

[17]  Chung C. Fu,et al.  Determination of Slab Participation from Weigh-In-Motion Bridge Testing , 1999 .

[18]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Load Distribution and Impact Factors for I-Girder Bridges , 1997 .

[19]  Harry W. Shenton,et al.  Load Distribution for a Highly Skewed Bridge: Testing and Analysis , 2004 .

[20]  Benjamin A. Graybeal,et al.  RELIABILITY OF VISUAL BRIDGE INSPECTION , 2001 .