Biomimetic wall-shaped adhesive microstructure for shear-induced attachment: the effects of pulling angle and preliminary displacement

To date, a handful of different gecko-like adhesives inspired by spatula-shaped attachment hairs have been suggested based on wedge and flap geometry of contact elements. However, while these surface designs have been shown to have directionality in adhesion, high friction, long lifetime and the ability to work in vacuum, an experimental verification of the very basic concept of the pulling angle effect has not yet been reported. To close this gap, here we use wall-shaped adhesive microstructures of three different flap heights to systematically study the effect of pulling angle on the normal and tangential components of the pull-off force tested at different preliminary tangential displacements. In accord with the prediction of the Kendall model for the normal component of peeling force, there is an optimal normal force that is required to detach the wall-shaped adhesive microstructure. The optimum is obtained at about half the distance needed to initiate sliding and at pulling angles that range within 60–90°, which suggests that the wall-shaped microstructure can tolerate relatively large inaccuracies in the loading direction. The increase of the attachment force with increasing flap height is found to correlate with the flap thickness, which decreased with increasing flap height.

[1]  Hayden Taylor,et al.  Bioinspired fibrillar adhesives: a review of analytical models and experimental evidence for adhesion enhancement by surface patterns , 2016 .

[2]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Effect of real contact geometry on adhesion , 2006 .

[3]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Adhesion and anisotropic friction enhancements of angled heterogeneous micro-fiber arrays with spherical and spatula tips , 2007 .

[4]  Kimberly L. Turner,et al.  Gecko‐Inspired Dry Adhesive for Robotic Applications , 2011 .

[5]  A. Tsipenyuk,et al.  Biomimetic wall-shaped hierarchical microstructure for gecko-like attachment. , 2015, Soft matter.

[6]  Aaron Parness,et al.  A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Yu Tian,et al.  Controllable Anisotropic Dry Adhesion in Vacuum: Gecko Inspired Wedged Surface Fabricated with Ultraprecision Diamond Cutting , 2017 .

[8]  Kimberly L. Turner,et al.  A microfabricated gecko-inspired controllable and reusable dry adhesive , 2013 .

[9]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Gecko-inspired controllable adhesive structures applied to micromanipulation , 2012 .

[10]  Haytam Kasem,et al.  Effect of counterface roughness on the friction of bionic wall-shaped microstructures for gecko-like attachments , 2017, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[11]  Yu Tian,et al.  Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Yu Tian,et al.  Peel-Zone Model of Tape Peeling Based on the Gecko Adhesive System , 2007 .

[13]  Yu Tian,et al.  Recent advances in gecko adhesion and friction mechanisms and development of gecko-inspired dry adhesive surfaces , 2013 .

[14]  M. Varenberg,et al.  Tribometer for In Situ Scanning Electron Microscopy of Microstructured Contacts , 2011 .

[15]  D. L. Christensen,et al.  Microwedge Machining for the Manufacture of Directional Dry Adhesives , 2013 .

[16]  Yu Tian,et al.  Design and fabrication of gecko-inspired adhesives. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[17]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Nicola Pugno,et al.  Spatulate structures in biological fibrillar adhesion , 2010 .

[19]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Biologically inspired polymer microfibers with spatulate tips as repeatable fibrillar adhesives , 2006 .

[20]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly's seta , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  K. Kendall Thin-film peeling-the elastic term , 1975 .

[22]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Friction and adhesion of gecko-inspired PDMS flaps on rough surfaces. , 2012, Langmuir.

[23]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Varenberg,et al.  Elimination of Stick-Slip Motion in Sliding of Split or Rough Surface , 2014, Tribology Letters.

[25]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Biological Micro- and Nanotribology: Nature’s Solutions , 2010 .

[26]  S. Gorb,et al.  Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  Yu Tian,et al.  Adhesion and friction force coupling of gecko setal arrays: implications for structured adhesive surfaces. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[28]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  S. Gorb,et al.  An experimental study of double-peeling mechanism inspired by biological adhesive systems , 2017 .

[30]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces , 1980 .

[31]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A Robot that Climbs Walls using Micro-structured Polymer Feet , 2005, CLAWAR.

[33]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  The adherence of beetle tarsal setae to glass , 1983 .

[34]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[35]  S. Gorb,et al.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR TENACITY ENHANCEMENT BY DIVISION OF CONTACT AREA , 2004 .