Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions

Abstract Taking the position that meaning-making, knowing, and content learning are fundamentally linked to language, this article explores writing as knowledge construction within the educational context of a college-level German program. The department's ongoing Humanities Assessment Project aims to trace the development of cultural content through the development of second language writing abilities. We report on the two interrelated components of the study, currently focused at the early advanced level of proficiency: a holistic framework created by the department's educators, and a linguistically oriented investigation that is grounded in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) and draws on its construct of grammatical metaphor (GM) for tracing knowledge creation in texts. Quantitative analysis of GM occurrence in the rated essays and analysis of syntactic complexity offer inconclusive results with regard to differentiating the quality of multiperspectival and reflective knowledge construction in the essays. However, qualitative exploration of the deployment of GM demonstrates its role as a resource in two forms of knowledge construction, the conceptual refiguration of content and the textual configuration of this content into knowledge. The article concludes with programmatic, research methodological, and pedagogical implications of the study.

[1]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Literacy in Science: Learning to Handle Text as Technology , 2003 .

[2]  G. Francis.  Labelling discourse: an aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion , 2002 .

[3]  S. Hood,et al.  Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing , 2010 .

[4]  A. Simon-Vandenbergen.  Lexical metaphor and interpersonal meaning , 2003 .

[5]  C. Matthiessen.  The 'Architecture' of language according to systemic functional theory : developments since the 1970s , 2007 .

[6]  Michael Carter.  Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines , 2007, College Composition & Communication.

[7]  M. Halliday.  Towards a Language-Based Theory of Learning , 1993 .

[8]  J. Norris,et al.  Exploring the Uses and Usefulness of ACTFL Oral Proficiency Ratings and Standards in College Foreign Language Departments. , 2003 .

[9]  D. Slobin.  Thinking for Speaking , 1987 .

[10]  Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen,et al.  Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective , 2007 .

[11]  Hans-Jörg Schmid,et al.  English abstract nouns as conceptual shells : from corpus to cognition , 2000 .

[12]  Lourdes Ortega,et al.  Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces , 2012 .

[13]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Realizing Advanced Foreign Language Writing Development in Collegiate Education: Curricular Design, Pedagogy, Assessment. , 2010 .

[14]  Michael Halliday,et al.  On Grammar and Grammatics , 1996 .

[15]  D. Slobin.  From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[16]  Beverly M Derewianka.  Grammatical metaphor in the transition to adolescence , 2003 .

[17]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[18]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation , 2011, Language Teaching.

[19]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Book Reviews: Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition , 2001 .

[20]  Peter H. Fries,et al.  On Theme, Rheme and discourse goals , 2002 .

[21]  M. Halliday.  The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse, with reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species , 2002 .

[22]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English , 2005 .

[23]  J. Flowerdew.  Signalling nouns in discourse , 2003 .

[24]  M. Charles.  ‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines , 2003 .

[25]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development , 2011 .

[26]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  English Text: System and structure , 1992 .

[27]  Bernard McKenna,et al.  Review of: What writing does and how it does it : an introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices, edited by Charles Bazerman and Paul Prior (Mahwah, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004) , 2005 .

[28]  Karl Maton,et al.  Disciplinarity : functional linguistic and sociological perspectives , 2011 .

[29]  Marianna Ryshina–Pankova.  Toward Mastering the Discourses of Reasoning: Use of Grammatical Metaphor at Advanced Levels of Foreign Language Acquisition. , 2010 .

[30]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .