Intelligent Vibration Signal Processing for Condition Monitoring

Recent advances in pattern analysis techniques together with the advent of miniature vibration sensors and high speed data acquisition technologies provide a unique opportunity to develop and implement in-situ, beneficent, and non-intrusive condition monitoring and quality assessment methods for a broad range of rotating machineries. This invited paper provides an overview of such a framework. It provides a review of classical methods used in vibration signal processing in both time and frequency domain. Subsequently, a collection of recent computational intelligence based methods in this problem domain with case studies using both single and multi-dimensional signals is presented. The datasets used in these case studies have been acquired from a variety of real-life problems 1 Vibration and Condition Monitoring Vibration signals provide useful information that leads to insights on the operating condition of the equipment under test [1, 2]. By inspecting the physical characteristics of the vibration signals, one is able to detect the presence of a fault in an operating machine, to localise the position of a crack in gear, to diagnose the health state of a ball bearing, etc. For decades, researchers are looking at means to diagnose automatically the health state of rotating machines, from the smaller bearings and gears to the larger combustion engines and turbines. With the advent of wireless technologies and miniature transducers, we are now able to monitor machine operating condition in real time and, with the aid of computational intelligence and pattern recognition technique, in an automated fashion. This paper draws from a collection of past and recent works in the area of automatic machine condition monitoring using vibration signals. Typically, vibration signals are acquired through vibration sensors. The three main classes of vibration sensors are displacement sensors, velocity sensors, and accelerometers. Displacement sensors can be non-contact sensors as in the case of optical sensors and they are more sensitive in the lower frequency range, typically less than 1 kHz. Velocity sensors, on the other hand, operate more effectively with flat amplitude response in the 10 Hz to 2 kHz range. Among these sensors, accelerometers have the best amplitude response in the high frequency range up to tens of kHz. Usually, accelerometers are built using capacitive sensing, or more commonly, a piezoelectric mechanism. Accelerometers are usually light weight ranging from 0.4 gram to 50 gram. 1.1 Advantages of vibration signal monitoring Vibration signal processing has some obvious advantages. First, vibration sensors are non-intrusive, and at times non-contact. As such, we can perform diagnostic in a non-destructive manner. Second, vibration signals can be obtained online and in-situ. This is a desired feature for production lines. The trending capability also provides means to predictive maintenance of the machineries. As such, unnecessary downtime for preventive maintenance can be minimized. Third, the vibration sensors are inexpensive and widely available. Modern mobile smart devices are equipped with one tri-axial accelerometer typically. Moreover, the technologies to acquire and convert the analogue outputs from the sensors are affordable nowadays. Last but not least, techniques for diagnosing a wide range

[1]  Theodoros Loutas,et al.  Condition monitoring of a single-stage gearbox with artificially induced gear cracks utilizing on-line vibration and acoustic emission measurements , 2009 .

[2]  A. Nandi,et al.  A comparison of artificial neural networks and other statistical methods for rotating machine condition classification , 1996 .

[3]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Real-time classification of rotating shaft loading conditions using artificial neural networks , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[4]  José Alfredo Ferreira Costa,et al.  Application of multiple decision trees for condition monitoring in induction motors , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[5]  Henning Thielemann,et al.  Condition monitoring of linear guideways using a matched wavelet approach , 2008, Signal Process..

[6]  James R. Ottewill,et al.  Condition monitoring of gearboxes using synchronously averaged electric motor signals , 2013 .

[7]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Genetic algorithms for feature selection in machine condition monitoring with vibration signals , 2000 .

[8]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Fault classification using genetic programming , 2007 .

[9]  Kesheng Wang,et al.  A comparison between two conventional order tracking techniques in rotating machine diagnostics , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering.

[10]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  FAULT DETECTION USING SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, AUGMENTED BY GENETIC ALGORITHMS , 2002 .

[11]  Tian Guang,et al.  Application of Order Tracking Technology on Condition Monitoring of Turbine , 2007, 2007 8th International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments.

[12]  Chris Mechefske Machine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnostics , 2005 .

[13]  Slim Soua,et al.  Determination of the combined vibrational and acoustic emission signature of a wind turbine gearbox and generator shaft in service as a pre-requisite for effective condition monitoring , 2013 .

[14]  Hui Li Gear Fault Monitoring Based on Order Tracking and Bi-spectrum under Running-Up Condition , 2007, Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2007).

[15]  A. K. Nandi,et al.  Higher-Order and Cyclostationary Statistics , 1999 .

[16]  Murat Alper Basaran,et al.  Condition monitoring of speed controlled induction motors using wavelet packets and discriminant analysis , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Fanrang Kong,et al.  Subspace-based gearbox condition monitoring by kernel principal component analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Feature generation using genetic programming with application to fault classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[19]  A. C. McCormick,et al.  Bispectral and trispectral features for machine condition diagnosis , 1999 .

[20]  N. Tandon,et al.  Condition monitoring of electric motor ball bearings for the detection of grease contaminants , 2007 .

[21]  Ruqiang Yan,et al.  Machine health diagnosis based on approximate entropy , 2004, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510).

[22]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Modified self-organising map for automated novelty detection applied to vibration signal monitoring , 2006 .

[23]  Wenxian Yang,et al.  Bivariate empirical mode decomposition and its contribution to wind turbine condition monitoring , 2011 .

[24]  Ruoyu Li,et al.  Plastic Bearing Fault Diagnosis Based on a Two-Step Data Mining Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Neural network autoregressive modeling of vibrations for condition monitoring of rotating shafts , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'97).

[26]  Guolin He,et al.  Semisupervised Distance-Preserving Self-Organizing Map for Machine-Defect Detection and Classification , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[27]  Đani Juričić,et al.  Rényi Entropy Based Statistical Complexity Analysis for Gear Fault Prognostics under Variable Load , 2012 .

[28]  Yimin Zhan,et al.  Robust detection of gearbox deterioration using compromised autoregressive modeling and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistic. Part II: Experiment and application , 2007 .

[29]  A. K. Nandi,et al.  Anomaly detection of rolling elements using fuzzy entropy and similarity measures , 2012 .

[30]  J. Mathew,et al.  The condition monitoring of rolling element bearings using vibration analysis , 1984 .

[31]  Jin Chen,et al.  Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for rolling bearing performance degradation assessment and prognosis , 2011 .

[32]  Tingting Mu,et al.  Multiclass Classification Based on Extended Support Vector Data Description , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[33]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Fault detection using genetic programming , 2005 .

[34]  Michael Pecht,et al.  Vibration model of rolling element bearings in a rotor-bearing system for fault diagnosis , 2013 .

[35]  Yimin Zhan,et al.  Robust detection of gearbox deterioration using compromised autoregressive modeling and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistic—Part I: Compromised autoregressive modeling with the aid of hypothesis tests and simulation analysis , 2007 .

[36]  A.K. Nandi,et al.  Detection and Classification of Rolling-Element Bearing Faults using Support Vector Machines , 2005, 2005 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing.