Syllable structure and integration of voicing and manner of articulation information in labial consonant identification.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Olzak. Widely separated spatial frequencies: Mechanism interactions , 1986, Vision Research.
[2] Ulrike Hahn,et al. Phoneme similarity and confusability , 2005 .
[3] David B Pisoni,et al. On the identification of place and voicing features in synthetic stop consonants. , 1974, Journal of phonetics.
[4] C. Best,et al. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] R D Thomas,et al. Perceptual interactions of facial dimensions in speeded classification and identification , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[6] J. L. Miller,et al. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[7] J Kingston,et al. Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] S. Blumstein,et al. Perceptual integration of the murmur and formant transitions for place of articulation in nasal consonants. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] T. M. Nearey,et al. Speech perception as pattern recognition. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] S. Blumstein,et al. Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Joanne L. Miller. Interactions in processing segmental and suprasegmental features of speech , 1978 .
[12] Noah Silbert,et al. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] J. L. Miller,et al. Studies on the perception of place and manner of articulation: a comparison of the labial-alveolar and nasal-stop distinctions. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Terrance M. Nearey,et al. The segment as a unit of speech perception , 1990 .
[15] Noah H. Silbert,et al. Integration of phonological information in obstruent consonant identification , 2009 .
[16] S. Blumstein,et al. Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English , 1997 .
[17] J. L. Miller,et al. Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] T. M. Nearey. Phoneme-like units and speech perception , 2001 .
[19] Eric Oglesbee. Multidimensional stop categorization in English, Spanish, Korean, Japanese, and Canadian French , 2008 .
[20] R. Port,et al. Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.
[21] N. Perrin,et al. Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.
[22] V C Tartter,et al. Asymmetric dependencies in processing phonetic features , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.
[23] R. Smits. Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[24] John Kingston,et al. Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection‐theoretic application of the Garner paradigm , 1995 .
[25] John Kingston,et al. On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast , 2008, J. Phonetics.
[26] R Smits,et al. Evidence for hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] José Benkí,et al. Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in English , 2001, J. Phonetics.
[28] A. Jongman,et al. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] F. Gregory Ashby,et al. Toward a Unified Theory of Similarity and Recognition , 1988 .
[30] J Kingston,et al. Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] P. Milenkovic,et al. Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] D. Massaro,et al. Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] T. Wickens. Maximum-likelihood estimation of a multivariate Gaussian rating model with excluded data , 1992 .
[34] T. M. Nearey,et al. Context Effects in a Double-Weak Theory of Speech Perception , 1992, Language and speech.
[35] S. Blumstein,et al. Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] D Norris,et al. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[37] J. Townsend,et al. Independence and separability in the perception of complex nonspeech sounds , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[38] L A Olzak,et al. Discrimination of Complex Patterns: Orientation Information is Integrated across Spatial Scale; Spatial-Frequency and Contrast Information are Not , 1997, Perception.
[39] D. Massaro,et al. Integration of featural information in speech perception. , 1978, Psychological review.
[40] L. Lisker,et al. A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .