1.6.3 What Makes Motif Patterns of Engineering Systems Architectures to Look Alike?

In recent times there is a growing interest in systems architectures in domains like biological systems and social networks leading to useful insights and generalizations. These developments have opened up possibility of investigating architectures of complex engineering systems on similar lines. Architecture of a system can be abstracted as a graph, wherein the nodes/vertices correspond to components and edges correspond to interconnections between them. Graphs representing system architecture have revealed motifs or patterns. Motifs are recurring patterns of 3-noded (or 4, 5 etc.) sub-graphs of the graph. Over-represented motifs have offered insights into the basic functionality of systems in some cases. Concept of motif significance profiles (i.e., proportions of various motifs present in a system) has also given rise to interesting insights. These profiles are seen to be highly correlated across systems of the same family (i.e., very similar proportions of motifs are present in systems of same type). We now explain the reasons for the resemblance of these motif profiles of system architectures within various engineering systems families. We explain this by considering a vast variety of system architectures (38 systems architectures arbitrarily chosen) ranging from –electronic circuits, software systems and mechanical engineering systems.

[1]  J. M. Ottino,et al.  Engineering complex systems , 2004, Nature.

[2]  L. D. Costa,et al.  Chain motifs: the tails and handles of complex networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Bin Xu,et al.  Process flow diagram of an ammonia plant as a complex network , 2005 .

[4]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004, Science.

[5]  K. Sudhakar,et al.  8.1.2 Overrepresented and Underrepresented Patterns in System Architectures Across Diverse Engineering Systems , 2009 .

[6]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[7]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[8]  S E Ahnert,et al.  Clustering signatures classify directed networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[10]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[12]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Defining and identifying communities in networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D.C. McFarlane,et al.  An Approach to the Application of the Design Structure Matrix for Assessing Reconfigurability of Distributed Manufacturing Systems , 2006, IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06).

[14]  U. Alon,et al.  Assigning numbers to the arrows: Parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.