A map estimation framework for HDR video synthesis

High dynamic range (HDR) image synthesis from multiple low dynamic range (LDR) exposures continues to be a topic of great interest. The extension to HDR video comprises a stiff challenge due to significant motion. In particular, loss of data due to poor exposures introduces great difficulty in exact motion estimation, and under such circumstances conventional optical flow calculation techniques usually fail. We propose a maximum a posterior (MAP) estimation framework for HDR video synthesis algorithm free of explicit optical flow calculation. We formulate HDR video synthesis as a MAP estimation problem, which subsequently can be reduced to an optimization problem based on meaningful statistical assumptions on foreground and background regions of the input video. In the background regions the underlying scenes are static, while in the foreground regions motion information is captured implicitly by a modified 3D steering kernel regression (3D SKR) approach. Solution to the optimization problem provides us with temporally coherent HDR video sequences without noticeable artifacts. Experimental results on challenging LDR video sets demonstrate that our proposed algorithm can achieve HDR video quality that is competitive with or better than state of the art alternatives.

[1]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Matrix Completion With Noise , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Yin Zhang,et al.  Solving a low-rank factorization model for matrix completion by a nonlinear successive over-relaxation algorithm , 2012, Mathematical Programming Computation.

[3]  Eli Shechtman,et al.  Patch-based high dynamic range video , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[4]  Tae-Hyun Oh,et al.  Robust High Dynamic Range Imaging by Rank Minimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Jun Hu,et al.  HDR Deghosting: How to Deal with Saturation? , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Volkan Cevher,et al.  Sparse Signal Recovery and Acquisition with Graphical Models , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  Chul Lee,et al.  Ghost-Free High Dynamic Range Imaging via Rank Minimization , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Adaptive dynamic range imaging: optical control of pixel exposures over space and time , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Michael Elad,et al.  Super-Resolution Without Explicit Subpixel Motion Estimation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Volkan Cevher,et al.  Sparse Signal Recovery Using Markov Random Fields , 2008, NIPS.

[12]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting , 2010 .

[13]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Ghost Removal in High Dynamic Range Images , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Kernel Regression for Image Processing and Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs , 1997, SIGGRAPH '08.

[16]  Chul Lee,et al.  Rate-distortion optimized layered coding of high dynamic range videos , 2012, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[17]  Olga Veksler,et al.  Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts , 2001, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Vishal Monga,et al.  MAP ESTIMATION-BASED HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE VIDEO SYNTHESIS , 2015 .

[19]  In-So Kweon,et al.  High dynamic range imaging by a rank-1 constraint , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[20]  Stephen Mangiat,et al.  High dynamic range video with ghost removal , 2010, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[21]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  High dynamic range video , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..