Choosing pasture maps: An assessment of pasture land classification definitions and a case study of Brazil

Abstract Pasture land occupies extensive areas and is increasingly of interest for sustainable intensification, land use diversification, greenhouse gas emission mitigation, and bioenergy expansion. Accurate maps of pasture and other managed land covers are needed for monitoring, intercomparison, assessing potential uses, and planning. Yet, land maps can be generated from different types of classification datasets – i.e. as a land use or land cover type – as well as different sources. In this study our aim was to assess and compare land use and land cover definitions for pasture, and examine variability in the resulting pasture land classification maps. First, we conducted a review of pasture definitions in commonly used mapping databases. We then performed a case study involving Brazil, a dominant global producer of pasture-based livestock. Six geospatial databases were harmonized and compared to each other and to MODIS land cover for Brazil including the Cerrado and Amazon biomes, which are internationally recognized for their ecological value. Total pasture area estimates for Brazil ranged by a factor greater than four, from about 430,000 km2 to over 1.7 million km2. Our analysis showed high variability in pasture land maps depending on the definitions, methods and underlying datasets used to generate them. The results are illustrative of a symptomatic problem for all manage land datasets, demonstrating the need for land categories studies and geospatial data resources that fully define land terms and describe measurable management attributes. Additionally, the suitability of individual geospatial datasets for different types of land mapping must be better described and reported. These recommendations would help bring more consistency in the consideration of managed lands in research, reporting, and policy development, as demonstrated here for pasture land using six case study datasets from multiple sources.

[1]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a 2001 National land-cover database for the United States , 2004 .

[2]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  GRAZING SYSTEMS, ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES, AND GLOBAL CHANGE , 2004 .

[3]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  HUMAN APPROPRIATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[4]  F. Achard,et al.  Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[6]  Kathleen Neumann,et al.  Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies , 2011 .

[7]  Limin Yang,et al.  An analysis of the IGBP global land-cover characterization process , 1999 .

[8]  Shuai Wang,et al.  Spatial Consistency Assessments for Global Land-Cover Datasets: A Comparison among GLC2000, CCI LC, MCD12, GLOBCOVER and GLCNMO , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Jorge L. S. Brito,et al.  Land use dynamics in the Brazilian Cerrado in the period from 2002 to 2013 , 2019, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira.

[10]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management , 2012, Nature.

[11]  José M. Paruelo,et al.  Characterizing fragmentation in temperate South America grasslands , 2006 .

[12]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classi(cid:142) cation at 1 km spatial resolution using a classi(cid:142) cation tree approach , 2004 .

[13]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets , 2010 .

[14]  J. Kaplan,et al.  Land use for animal production in global change studies: Defining and characterizing a framework , 2017, Global change biology.

[15]  D. Kidd,et al.  Soil quality evaluation and the interaction with land use and soil order in Tasmania, Australia , 2010 .

[16]  Laerte Guimarães Ferreira,et al.  Assessing the Spatial and Occupation Dynamics of the Brazilian Pasturelands Based on the Automated Classification of MODIS Images from 2000 to 2016 , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[17]  B. Strassburg,et al.  Intensification of cattle ranching production systems: socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[18]  M. H. Costa,et al.  Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture , 2016, Global change biology.

[19]  J. Kastens,et al.  Intensification in agriculture-forest frontiers: Land use responses to development and conservation policies in Brazil , 2018, Global Environmental Change.

[20]  John Hendrickson,et al.  Diversification and ecosystem services for conservation agriculture: Outcomes from pastures and integrated crop–livestock systems , 2013, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[21]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Mapping contemporary global cropland and grassland distributions on a 5 × 5 minute resolution , 2007 .

[22]  Wenjuan Sun,et al.  Methane uptake in global forest and grassland soils from 1981 to 2010. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  J. Cihlar,et al.  From Land Cover to Land Use: A Methodology for Efficient Land Use Mapping over Large Areas , 2001 .

[24]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000 , 2008 .

[25]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  A comprehensive global 5 min resolution land-use data set for the year 2000 consistent with national census data , 2007 .

[26]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[27]  G. B. Martha,et al.  The development of Brazilian agriculture: future technological challenges and opportunities , 2012, Agriculture & Food Security.

[28]  P. Thornton,et al.  Livestock and the Environment: What Have We Learned in the Past Decade? , 2015 .

[29]  A. Leytem,et al.  Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use , 2016 .

[30]  Marcos Aurélio Vasconcelos de Freitas,et al.  Reduction of emissions from Brazilian cattle raising and the generation of energy: Intensification and confinement potentials , 2014 .

[31]  Ingmar Nitze,et al.  Assessment of multi-temporal, multi-sensor radar and ancillary spatial data for grasslands monitoring in Ireland using machine learning approaches , 2014 .

[32]  A. D. Gregorio,et al.  Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual , 2000 .

[33]  Laerte Guimarães Ferreira,et al.  Monitoring the brazilian pasturelands: A new mapping approach based on the landsat 8 spectral and temporal domains , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[34]  L. G. Barioni,et al.  Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from cattle raising in Brazil , 2012, Climatic Change.

[35]  L. O. Fresco,et al.  Imaginable futures: a contribution to thinking about land use planning. , 1994 .

[36]  A. Faaij,et al.  A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 , 2007 .

[37]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[38]  L. G. Barioni,et al.  The role of agricultural intensification in Brazil's Nationally Determined Contribution on emissions mitigation , 2018 .

[39]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[40]  B. Minasny,et al.  Digital Soil Map of the World , 2009, Science.

[41]  J. Schellberg,et al.  Ground and satellite based assessment of rangeland management in sub-tropical Argentina , 2010 .

[42]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world's croplands , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Armel Thibaut Kaptué Tchuenté,et al.  Comparison and relative quality assessment of the GLC2000, GLOBCOVER, MODIS and ECOCLIMAP land cover data sets at the African continental scale , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[44]  Philip K. Thornton,et al.  Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Global Land Cover Mapping: A Review and Uncertainty Analysis , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[46]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A review , 2016 .

[47]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  A remote sensing based vegetation classification logic for global land cover analysis , 1995 .

[48]  Javier Gallego,et al.  Comparison of Global Land Cover Datasets for Cropland Monitoring , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[49]  R. DeFries,et al.  Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  G. J. Collatz,et al.  ISLSCP II Potential Natural Vegetation Cover , 2010 .

[51]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Land availability for biofuel production. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992 , 1999 .

[53]  Philip K. Thornton,et al.  Agriculture and food systems in sub-Saharan Africa in a 4°C+ world , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[54]  Hao Jiang,et al.  Assessing Consistency of Five Global Land Cover Data Sets in China , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[55]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[56]  P. Havlík,et al.  Seasonality constraints to livestock grazing intensity , 2017, Global change biology.

[57]  Urs Wegmüller,et al.  Multi-year global land cover mapping at 300 M and characterization for climate modelling : Achievements of the land cover component of the ESA climate change initiative , 2015 .

[58]  T. Quaife,et al.  Application of Sentinel-2A data for pasture biomass monitoring using a physically based radiative transfer model , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[59]  Martin Herold,et al.  A joint initiative for harmonization and validation of land cover datasets , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[60]  Xuezhi Feng,et al.  Accuracy assessment of seven global land cover datasets over China , 2017 .

[61]  A. Moraes,et al.  Integrated crop–livestock systems in the Brazilian subtropics , 2014 .

[62]  C. Justice,et al.  Global land cover classification by remote sensing: present capabilities and future possibilities , 1991 .

[63]  E. Dwyer,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: from observation to management—a review , 2016 .

[64]  K. K. Goldewijk.  Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE Database , 2001 .

[65]  L. G. Barioni,et al.  Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation , 2016 .

[66]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems , 2013 .

[67]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[68]  Jan G. P. W. Clevers,et al.  Land use patterns and related carbon losses following deforestation in South America , 2015 .

[69]  L. Verchot,et al.  Global Sequestration Potential of Increased Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[70]  Yuqi Bai,et al.  A new research paradigm for global land cover mapping , 2016, Ann. GIS.

[71]  Li Li,et al.  Mapping degraded grassland on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau with multi-temporal Landsat 8 data - where do the severely degraded areas occur? , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[72]  Le Yu,et al.  Detailed dynamic land cover mapping of Chile: Accuracy improvement by integrating multi-temporal data , 2016 .

[73]  P. Verburg,et al.  From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[74]  José M. Paruelo,et al.  Spatial variability of above‐ground net primary production in Uruguayan grasslands: a remote sensing approach , 2010 .

[75]  Sandy P. Harrison,et al.  Ecophysiological and bioclimatic foundations for a global plant functional classification , 2010 .

[76]  Göran Berndes,et al.  A new high-resolution nationwide aboveground carbon map for Brazil , 2017 .

[77]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 , 2010 .

[78]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Supplementary material for the article: “Can intensification of cattle ranching reduce deforestation in the Amazon? Insights from an agent-based social-ecological model” , 2018 .

[79]  R. Wall,et al.  Livestock and food security: vulnerability to population growth and climate change , 2014, Global change biology.

[80]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Land speculation and conservation policy leakage in Brazil , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[81]  P. Newton,et al.  Climate change mitigation through intensified pasture management: Estimating greenhouse gas emissions on cattle farms in the Brazilian Amazon , 2017 .

[82]  S. Frolking,et al.  Linking remote‐sensing estimates of land cover and census statistics on land use to produce maps of land use of the conterminous United States , 2001 .

[83]  P. Dumas,et al.  Feeding proteins to livestock: Global land use and food vs. feed competition , 2014 .

[84]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[85]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[86]  L. G. Barioni,et al.  When enough should be enough: Improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil , 2014 .

[87]  G. Asner,et al.  Cloud cover in Landsat observations of the Brazilian Amazon , 2001 .

[88]  Navin Ramankutty,et al.  Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities: The availability of new global data sets , 2004 .

[89]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Sentinels for science: potential of Sentinel-1, -2, and -3 missions for scientific observations of ocean, cryosphere, and land , 2012 .

[90]  Alexis J. Comber,et al.  The separation of land cover from land use using data primitives , 2008 .

[91]  Augusto Seabra Santos,et al.  Is the expansion of sugarcane over pasturelands a sustainable strategy for Brazil's bioenergy industry? , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[92]  W. Mcconnell.  Meeting in the middle: The challenge of meso-level integration , 2002 .

[93]  Pierre J. Gerber,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices , 2015 .

[94]  L. Kumar,et al.  Analysis of spatio-temporal dynamics of land use and cover changes in Western Kenya , 2019, Geocarto International.

[95]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy , 2003 .

[96]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  A scalable approach to mapping annual land cover at 250 m using MODIS time series data: A case study in the Dry Chaco ecoregion of South America , 2010 .