Ilizarov external fixation and then nailing in management of infected nonunions of the tibial shaft.

BACKGROUND Ilizarov technique is useful in the management of infected nonunions of the tibia. Its main drawback is the long duration of external fixation (EF) with marked patient discomfort. Several techniques have been described for early removal of EF to avoid this problem. METHODS Between September 2000 and October 2001, a prospective study at a tertiary trauma center was performed. Thirty-three patients with infected nonunion of the tibial shaft were included. The eradication of infection was by debridement, followed by limb reconstruction using segment transport technique with Ilizarov EF system. When the transported segment reached the docking site, we offered the patients removal of EF, and replacement by intramedullary (I M) fixation with bone graft at the docking site. Advantages and risks were explained to all patients. Patients (N = 17) who accepted this technique were compared with patients (N = 16) who preferred to continue in EF till full bone union, with bone graft at the docking site used in both groups. Mean age of the patients was 29 years, and mean duration of nonunion was 12.6 (range, 6-22) months. Average duration of follow-up from the date of presentation was 36 (range, 22-48) months. Main outcome measurements were assessment of bone and functional outcome using the classification of the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov, EF index, radiographic consolidation index, healing time, duration of EF, and complications RESULTS The average duration of EF in the first group was 3.1 month, meanwhile in the second group it was 8.5 months. The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov bony and functional outcome assessment score showed no statistically significant difference between the two techniques on follow-up. CONCLUSION Early removal of EF and replacement by intramedullary nail can achieve complete healing for infected nonunion of the tibial shaft with shorter duration of EF; nearly one-third the usual duration of EF and give the same functional and bony outcome as the classic technique. It is a relatively safe technique but the risk of infection recurrence must be explained to the patient.

[1]  R. Jakob,et al.  Sequential intramedullary nailing of open tibial shaft fractures after external fixation , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[2]  H. Kreder,et al.  The Effect of Smoking on Clinical Outcome and Complication Rates Following Ilizarov Reconstruction , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[3]  Chi-Chuan Wu,et al.  Tibial lengthening: technique for speedy lengthening by external fixation and secondary internal fixation. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  N. Maffulli,et al.  The treatment of open tibial fractures and of tibial non-union with a novel external fixator. , 2002, Injury.

[5]  R. Simonis,et al.  Augmentative Ilizarov External Fixation After Failure of Diaphyseal Union With Intramedullary Nailing , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  K. Emara.  Hemi-corticotomy in the management of chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia , 2002, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  S. Stapley,et al.  Spread of infection, in an animal model, after intramedullary nailing of an infected external fixator pin track , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  P. Schoenecker,et al.  Pin site care during external fixation in children: results of a nihilistic approach. , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[9]  D. Paley,et al.  Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects. , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  H. Steen,et al.  Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail, using the Ilizarov external fixator. Major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. , 1999, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  K. Koo,et al.  Tibial bone defects treated by internal bone transport using the Ilizarov method , 1998, International Orthopaedics.

[12]  G. Hosny,et al.  The treatment of infected non-union of the tibia by compression-distraction techniques using the Ilizarov external fixator , 1998, International Orthopaedics.

[13]  A. Ateşalp,et al.  Treatment of tibial bone defects with the Ilizarov circular external fixator in high-velocity gunshot wounds , 1998, International Orthopaedics.

[14]  L. López-Durán,et al.  Unreamed intramedullary locking nailing for open tibial fractures , 1998, International Orthopaedics.

[15]  J. M. Gonzalo-Orden,et al.  Coating titanium implants with bioglass and with hydroxyapatite , 1998, International Orthopaedics.

[16]  A. Bhave,et al.  Femoral Lengthening over an Intramedullary Nail. A Matched-Case Comparison with Ilizarov Femoral Lengthening* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. Keating,et al.  Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the tibia. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  D. Martí-Garín,et al.  External fixation and secondary intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures. A randomised, prospective trial. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  M. Chapman,et al.  Limb Lengthening Over an Intramedullary Nail: An Animal Study and Clinical Report , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  C. C. Wu,et al.  Complicated open fractures of the distal tibia treated by secondary interlocking nailing. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  M. Raschke,et al.  Segmental transport after unreamed intramedullary nailing. Preliminary report of a "Monorail" system. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  D. Paley,et al.  Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  D. Paley,et al.  Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.