Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87403 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2015‐125)

Abstract Maize MON 87403 was developed to increase ear biomass at early reproductive phase through the expression of a modified AtHB17 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana, encoding a plant transcription factor of the HD‐Zip II family. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses did not identify issues requiring assessment for food and feed safety. No statistically significant differences in the agronomic and phenotypic characteristics tested between maize MON 87403 and its conventional counterpart were identified. The compositional analysis of maize MON 87403 did not identify differences that require further assessment. The GMO Panel did not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the AtHB17∆113 protein, as expressed in maize MON 87403. The nutritional value of food and feed derived from maize MON 87403 is not expected to differ from that of food and feed derived from non‐genetically modified (GM) maize varieties. Based on the outcome of the studies considered in the comparative analysis and molecular characterisation, the GMO Panel concludes that maize MON 87403 is as safe and nutritious as the conventional counterpart and the non‐GM maize reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable maize MON 87403 grains into the environment, maize MON 87403 would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize MON 87403. In conclusion, the GMO Panel considers that maize MON 87403, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM maize reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

[1]  R. Binimelis,et al.  Teosinte in Europe – Searching for the Origin of a Novel Weed , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Explanatory note on literature searching conducted in the context of GMO applications for (renewed) market authorisation and annual post‐market environmental monitoring reports on GMOs authorised in the EU market , 2017, EFSA Supporting Publications.

[3]  K. Pascher Spread of volunteer and feral maize plants in Central Europe: recent data from Austria , 2016, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[4]  J. Phillips,et al.  Comparative analysis of maize (Zea mays) crop performance: natural variation, incremental improvements and economic impacts. , 2014, Plant biotechnology journal.

[5]  S. Hazen,et al.  Expression of a Truncated ATHB17 Protein in Maize Increases Ear Weight at Silking , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  S. Virtanen,et al.  Dietary exposure assessments for children in europe (the EXPOCHI project): rationale, methods and design , 2011, Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique.

[7]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants , 2011 .

[8]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Methodological characteristics of the national dietary surveys carried out in the European Union as included in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database , 2011, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[9]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants , 2011 .

[10]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants andmicroorganisms and derived food and feed , 2010 .

[11]  Gábor L. Lövei,et al.  Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making , 2010 .

[12]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance for Import and Processing: the EuropaBio approach , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[13]  Enric Melé,et al.  Effect of volunteers on maize gene flow , 2009, Transgenic Research.

[14]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  Post-harvest gene escape and approaches for minimizing it , 2008 .

[15]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance: Roles and Responsibilities The Industry View , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[16]  F. Ariel,et al.  The true story of the HD-Zip family. , 2007, Trends in plant science.

[17]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Generation of marker-free transgenic maize by regular two-border Agrobacterium transformation vectors , 2004, Transgenic Research.

[18]  Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer , 2002 .

[19]  F. Sherman,et al.  Nα-terminal Acetylation of Eukaryotic Proteins* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  S. Renner Pollination Ecology ‐ A Practical Approach , 1993 .