A Computational/Experimental Assessment of Antitumor Activity of Polymer Nanoassemblies for pH-Controlled Drug Delivery to Primary and Metastatic Tumors

PurposePolymer nanoassemblies (PNAs) with drug release fine-tuned to occur in acidic tumor regions (pH < 7) while sparing normal tissues (pH = 7.4) were previously shown to hold promise as nanoparticle drug carriers to effectively suppress tumor growth with reduced systemic toxicity. However, therapeutic benefits of pH-controlled drug delivery remain elusive due to complex interactions between the drug carriers, tumor cells with varying drug sensitivity, and the tumor microenvironment.MethodsWe implement a combined computational and experimental approach to evaluate the in vivo antitumor activity of acid-sensitive PNAs controlling drug release in pH 5 ~ 7.4 at different rates [PNA1 (fastest) > PNA2 > PNA3 (slowest)].ResultsComputational simulations projecting the transport, drug release, and antitumor activity of PNAs in primary and metastatic tumor models of colorectal cancer correspond well with experimental observations in vivo. The simulations also reveal that all PNAs could reach peak drug concentrations in tumors at 11 h post injection, while PNAs with slower drug release (PNA2 and PNA3) reduced tumor size more effectively than fast drug releasing PNA1 (24.5 and 20.3 vs 7.5%, respectively, as fraction of untreated control).ConclusionA combined computational/experimental approach may help to evaluate pH-controlled drug delivery targeting aggressive tumors that have substantial acidity.

[1]  V. Torchilin,et al.  Micellar Nanocarriers: Pharmaceutical Perspectives , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[2]  Kazunori Kataoka,et al.  Multifunctional polymeric micelles with folate-mediated cancer cell targeting and pH-triggered drug releasing properties for active intracellular drug delivery. , 2005, Molecular bioSystems.

[3]  Yi Zhou,et al.  Catabolic efficiency of aerobic glycolysis: The Warburg effect revisited , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[4]  K. Kataoka,et al.  Preclinical and clinical studies of anticancer agent‐incorporating polymer micelles , 2009, Cancer science.

[5]  Andrei Ponta POLYMER MICELLES FOR TUNABLE DRUG RELEASE AND ENHANCED ANTITUMOR EFFICACY , 2013 .

[6]  S. McDougall,et al.  Multiscale modelling and nonlinear simulation of vascular tumour growth , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[7]  Yu Matsumoto,et al.  Improving Drug Potency and Efficacy by Nanocarrier-Mediated Subcellular Targeting , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  R. Jain,et al.  Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Kazunori Kataoka,et al.  Intelligent polymeric micelles from functional poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(amino acid) block copolymers. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[10]  T. Kaneko,et al.  New hydrazone derivatives of adriamycin and their immunoconjugates--a correlation between acid stability and cytotoxicity. , 1991, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[11]  Y. Bae,et al.  PEG-poly(amino acid) Block Copolymer Micelles for Tunable Drug Release , 2010, Pharmaceutical Research.

[12]  Atsushi Harada,et al.  Design of environment-sensitive supramolecular assemblies for intracellular drug delivery: polymeric micelles that are responsive to intracellular pH change. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  H. Frieboes,et al.  In vivo safety and antitumor efficacy of bifunctional small hairpin RNAs specific for the human Stathmin 1 oncoprotein. , 2011, DNA and cell biology.

[14]  Eleftheria Tsakalozou,et al.  Drug Release Patterns and Cytotoxicity of PEG-poly(aspartate) Block Copolymer Micelles in Cancer Cells , 2012, Pharmaceutical Research.

[15]  S. Gong,et al.  Tumor-targeting, pH-responsive, and stable unimolecular micelles as drug nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. , 2010, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[16]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Integrated intravital microscopy and mathematical modeling to optimize nanotherapeutics delivery to tumors. , 2012, AIP advances.

[17]  S. McDougall,et al.  Mathematical modelling of dynamic adaptive tumour-induced angiogenesis: clinical implications and therapeutic targeting strategies. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  J. Lowengrub,et al.  Nonlinear simulation of the effect of microenvironment on tumor growth. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Enhanced performance of macrophage-encapsulated nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel in hypo-perfused cancer lesions. , 2016, Nanoscale.

[21]  Jing Zhang,et al.  A tumoral acidic pH-responsive drug delivery system based on a novel photosensitizer (fullerene) for in vitro and in vivo chemo-photodynamic therapy. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[22]  G. G. Van den Eynden,et al.  The histological growth pattern of colorectal cancer liver metastases has prognostic value , 2012, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[23]  E. van Marck,et al.  Breast adenocarcinoma liver metastases, in contrast to colorectal cancer liver metastases, display a non-angiogenic growth pattern that preserves the stroma and lacks hypoxia , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  S. Masuda,et al.  Anticancer drug development from traditional cytotoxic to targeted therapies: evidence of shorter drug research and development time, and shorter drug lag in Japan , 2012, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[25]  Mingji Jin,et al.  Evaluation of doxorubicin-loaded pH-sensitive polymeric micelle release from tumor blood vessels and anticancer efficacy using a dorsal skin-fold window chamber model , 2014, Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.

[26]  Mark A. J. Chaplain,et al.  The effect of interstitial pressure on therapeutic agent transport: coupling with the tumor blood and lymphatic vascular systems. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  M. Stenzel,et al.  Acid‐Degradable Polymers for Drug Delivery: A Decade of Innovation , 2013 .

[28]  J. Fréchet,et al.  A new approach towards acid sensitive copolymer micelles for drug delivery. , 2003, Chemical communications.

[29]  Release, Partitioning, and Conjugation Stability of Doxorubicin in Polymer Micelles Determined by Mechanistic Modeling , 2015, Pharmaceutical Research.

[30]  Hermann B. Frieboes,et al.  Computational Modeling of Tumor Response to Drug Release from Vasculature-Bound Nanoparticles , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  I. Tannock,et al.  Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. , 1989, Cancer research.

[32]  Y. Bae,et al.  Comparison between Microplate Spectrometry and LC/MS Chromato- graphy for Facile Pilot Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution Studies of Doxorubicin-loaded Nanoparticle Drug Carriers , 2012 .

[33]  R. Griffin,et al.  Influence of Tumor pH on Therapeutic Response , 2006 .

[34]  C. M. Roth,et al.  Nanoscale drug delivery systems for enhanced drug penetration into solid tumors: current progress and opportunities. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[35]  John Lowengrub,et al.  An interdisciplinary computational/experimental approach to evaluate drug-loaded gold nanoparticle tumor cytotoxicity. , 2016, Nanomedicine.

[36]  K. Bennewith,et al.  Quantifying Transient Hypoxia in Human Tumor Xenografts by Flow Cytometry , 2004, Cancer Research.

[37]  R K Jain,et al.  Extravascular diffusion in normal and neoplastic tissues. , 1984, Cancer research.

[38]  Robert Langer,et al.  Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. , 2009, ACS nano.

[39]  Orhan Nalcioglu,et al.  Nanotechnology in Cancer Drug Therapy: A Biocomputational Approach , 2006 .

[40]  Min Wu,et al.  The effect of interstitial pressure on tumor growth: coupling with the blood and lymphatic vascular systems. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  John S. Lowengrub,et al.  A New Ghost Cell/Level Set Method for Moving Boundary Problems: Application to Tumor Growth , 2008, J. Sci. Comput..

[42]  Y. Bae,et al.  Tumor-preferential sustained drug release enhances antitumor activity of block copolymer micelles , 2014, Journal of drug targeting.