A detailed characterization of across chip line width variation (ACLV) has been carried out on the latest Nikon scanners with a combination of advanced metrology techniques in Texas Instruments, including scatterometer-based image field and CD fingerprinting, lens aberrations measurement using a Litel in-situ interferometer, and illumination source imaging with a pin-hole camera. This paper describes the application of the above techniques in our investigation of the root causes for pattern CD bias between vertical and horizontal features. Illumination source radiance distribution is found sometimes to have a significant impact on V-H bias and the final overall ACLV on production wafers. Examples are given to demonstrate a comprehensive methodology that is used to quantitatively break down the overall CD errors and correlate them back to the basic optical and imaging components. It is shown through pupil-gram analysis that the ellipticity in partial coherence is typically within 1+/-1% for conventional illuminations settings on the advanced Nikon scanners while the uneven radiance distribution across the source plays a major role in V-H pattern CD bias. For scanners with low and uniform lens coma aberrations, the V-H bias after removing the contribution from image field errors is found to follow a linear relationship with the source radiance non-uniformity described also in terms of ellipticity. It is shown that radiance ellipticity is a bigger concern for off-axis illuminators. Tighter design rules patterned with off-axis illumination are more vulnerable to source radiance non-uniformity as well as lens aberrations. Illuminator induced V-H bias across the slit is compared to the signature caused by lens aberrations specifically uneven x,y-coma. Implications to exposure tool specification, control, and matching are further explored through experiments and lithography simulation for the current 130nm production and the future technology nodes in development.
[1]
Joseph P. Kirk,et al.
Pupil illumination: in-situ measurement of partial coherence
,
1998,
Advanced Lithography.
[2]
N Seong,et al.
Measurement of lens aberration by using in-situ interferometer and classification of lens for correct application
,
2000,
Advanced Lithography.
[3]
Mark Terry,et al.
Gauging the performance of an in-situ interferometer
,
2000,
Advanced Lithography.
[4]
Stephen P. Renwick,et al.
Influence of laser spatial parameters and illuminator pupil-fill performance on the lithographic performance of a scanner
,
2002,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[5]
Kafai Lai,et al.
Methodology for generating exposure tool specifications for alternating phase-shift mask application for 70-nm node
,
2002,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[6]
Nigel R. Farrar,et al.
In-situ measurement of lens aberrations
,
2000,
Advanced Lithography.
[7]
Stephen P. Renwick,et al.
Application of CD error budget analysis to ArF scanner performance
,
2001,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[8]
Toshiharu Nakashima,et al.
Impact of Zernike cross-term on linewidth control
,
2002,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[10]
Gary Zhang,et al.
Characterization of optical proximity matching for 130-nm node gate line width
,
2003,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.