Arguing About Task Reallocation Using Ontological Information in Multi-Agent Systems

Argumentation-based dialogue is claimed to be a rich form of agent interaction, which allows agents to make informed decisions using the additional information that is exchanged as arguments during the dialogue. In this paper, we demonstrate how agents can use domain specific knowledge provided by access to ontological information in the process of participating in argumentation-base dialogues. We also demonstrate how information obtained in a dialogue can be used by the agents to argue in subsequent dialogues. As an example scenario, we refer to an assisted living application where agents argue about task reallocation. We then define an agent decision-making process and a protocol; the decision-making and the protocol for argumentation-based dialogues are defined for cooperative agents in our scenario (i.e., task reallocation).

[1]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Modelling dialogues using argumentation , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[3]  Gerhard Brewka,et al.  Dynamic Argument Systems: A Formal Model of Argumentation Processes Based on Situation Calculus , 2001, J. Log. Comput..

[4]  F. Toni,et al.  Logic agents , dialogues and negotiation : an abductive approach , 2001 .

[5]  Donald Nute,et al.  Defeasible Logic , 1994, INAP.

[6]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[7]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Argumentation-Based Dialogues for Agent Co-Ordination , 2003 .

[8]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Locutions for Argumentation in Agent Interaction Protocols , 2004, AC.

[9]  L. Stein,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference , 2004 .

[10]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-agent Argument over Proposals for Action , 2004, ArgMAS.

[11]  Michael J. Maher,et al.  Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic , 2004, J. Log. Comput..

[12]  N. Iyadrahwa,et al.  Argumentation-based negotiation , 2004 .

[13]  Álvaro F. Moreira,et al.  Agent-Oriented Programming with Underlying Ontological Reasoning , 2005, DALT.

[14]  Antonis C. Kakas,et al.  Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[15]  Andrea Omicini,et al.  CArtAgO: An infrastructure for engineering computational environments in MAS , 2006, AAMAS 2006.

[16]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: Context and Recent Developments , 2006, ArgMAS.

[17]  Yarden Katz,et al.  Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[18]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  A generative inquiry dialogue system , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[19]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason (Wiley Series in Agent Technology) , 2007 .

[20]  Rafael H. Bordini,et al.  JASDL: A Practical Programming Approach Combining Agent and Semantic Web Technologies , 2008, DALT.

[21]  Zakaria Maamar,et al.  An Argumentation-based Protocol for Conflict Resolution , 2008 .

[22]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  Assumption-Based Argumentation , 2009, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence.

[23]  Alessandro Ricci,et al.  Environment programming in multi-agent systems: an artifact-based perspective , 2011, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[24]  Henry Prakken,et al.  An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments , 2010, Argument Comput..

[25]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies , 2011, Semantic Web.

[26]  Stephen J. Roberts Local decision-making in multi-agent systems , 2011 .

[27]  Tudor Berariu,et al.  An Argumentation Framework for BDI Agents , 2013, IDC.

[28]  Rafael H. Bordini,et al.  An Approach for Argumentation-based Reasoning Using Defeasible Logic in Multi-Agent Programming Languages , 2014 .

[29]  Davide Ancona,et al.  CooL-AgentSpeak: Endowing AgentSpeak-DL agents with plan exchange and ontology services , 2014, Web Intell. Agent Syst..

[30]  Rafael H. Bordini,et al.  Formal semantics of speech acts for argumentative dialogues , 2014, AAMAS.