Influence of tool wear on surface roughness in hard turning using differently shaped ceramic tools

Abstract Hard turning has been applied in many cases in producing bearings, gears, cams, shafts, axels, and other mechanical components since the early 1980s. Mixed ceramics (aluminum oxide plus TiC or TiCN) is one of the two cutting tool materials (apart from PCBN) widely used for finish machining of hardened steel (HRC 50–65) parts, especially under dry machining conditions and moderate cutting speed ranging from 90 to 120 m/min. This paper reports an extensive characterization of the surface roughness generated during hard turning (HT) operations performed with conventional and wiper ceramic tools at variable feed rate and its changes originated from tool wear. Moreover, it compares some predominant tool wear patterns produced on the two types of ceramic inserts and their influence on the alteration of surface profiles. After the hard turning tests, the relevant changes of surface profiles and surface roughness parameters were successively registered and measured by a stylus profilometer. In this investigation, a set of 2D surface roughness parameters, as well as profile and surface characteristics, such as the amplitude distribution functions, bearing area curves and symmetrical curves of geometrical contact obtained for the machined surface, were determined and analyzed. A novel aspect of this research is that the notch wear progress at the secondary cutting (trailing) edges was found to produce the substantial modifications of the individual irregularities, and constitute the altered surface profiles. Moreover, this research contributes to practical aspects of HT technology due to exploring the relations between the tool state at different times within the tool life and the relevant surface roughness characterization.

[1]  A. Abrão,et al.  Turning of hardened 100Cr6 bearing steel with ceramic and PCBN cutting tools , 2003 .

[2]  Berend Denkena,et al.  Advancing Cutting Technology , 2003 .

[3]  W. Grzesik,et al.  Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts , 2006 .

[4]  J. Y. Wang,et al.  The Effect of Tool Flank Wear on the Heat Transfer, Thermal Damage and Cutting Mechanics in Finish Hard Tuning , 1999 .

[5]  A. Senthil Kumar,et al.  Machinability of hardened steel using alumina based ceramic cutting tools , 2003 .

[6]  Hans Kurt Tönshoff,et al.  Cutting of Hardened Steel , 2000 .

[7]  Hossam A. Kishawy,et al.  Effects of process parameters on material side flow during hard turning , 1999 .

[8]  Y. K. Chou,et al.  Experimental investigation on CBN turning of hardened AISI 52100 steel , 2002 .

[9]  Ekkard Brinksmeier,et al.  Capability Profile of Hard Cutting and Grinding Processes , 2005 .

[10]  Gwidon Stachowiak,et al.  Wear Behaviour of Ceramic Cutting-Tools , 1994 .

[11]  B. Griffiths Manufacturing Surface Technology , 2001 .

[12]  Y. Kevin Chou Hard turning of M50 steel with different microstructures in continuous and intermittent cutting , 2003 .

[13]  W. Grzesik,et al.  Comparative assessment of surface roughness produced by hard machining with mixed ceramic tools including 2D and 3D analysis , 2005 .

[14]  W. König,et al.  Turning versus grinding: a comparison of surface integrity aspects and attainable accuracies , 1993 .

[15]  Kazuo Nakayama,et al.  Machining Characteristics of Hard Materials , 1988 .

[16]  Y. Kevin Chou,et al.  Tool wear mechanism in continuous cutting of hardened tool steels , 1997 .

[17]  A. Abrão,et al.  Hard turning: AISI 4340 high strength low alloy steel and AISI D2 cold work tool steel , 2005 .

[18]  G. Boothroyd,et al.  Fundamentals of machining and machine tools , 2006 .

[19]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Advanced Tool Edge Geometry for High Precision Hard Turning , 2005 .

[20]  J. Rech,et al.  Surface finish on hardened bearing steel parts produced by superhard and abrasive tools , 2007 .