Accuracy versus choice response time in sound localization

Abstract An experiment was conducted to further explore sound localization for frontal sound incidence. The question of interest was whether two response measures, accuracy in loudspeaker identification and choice response time would be differentially affected by variation in three parameters. These were the number of loudspeakers (three, five and seven), the separation between speakers (15 ° versus 30 °), and stimulus frequency (500 versus 4000 Hz). Twelve normal-hearing subjects were tested in a semi-reverberant room that modelled real-world listening. Each was presented 12 blocks of listening trials, across which the 12 conditions were presented in random order. A block comprised 20 random presentations of a 300-ms one-third octave noise band from each speaker. Subjects responded using a set of microswitches in the same configuration as the loudspeaker array. Accuracy decreased as the number of speakers increased and their separation decreased. Response time increased with number but was unaffected by separation. The effect of frequency was relatively small. A two-stage conceptual model, consisting of sensory encoding and non-sensory decision-making, provided a reasonable framework for the results.

[1]  Wayne W. Daniel,et al.  Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences , 1974 .

[2]  Abel Sm,et al.  Indices of hearing in patients with central auditory pathology. II. Choice response time. , 1992 .

[3]  J. Katz,et al.  Handbook of clinical audiology , 1978 .

[4]  F. Donders.  On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[5]  C. Douglas Creelman,et al.  Human Discrimination of Auditory Duration , 1962 .

[6]  R. Luce,et al.  Decision structure and time relations in simple choice behavior , 1956 .

[7]  Larry E. Humes,et al.  A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level , 1982 .

[8]  William C. Stebbins,et al.  Animal Psychophysics: the design and conduct of sensory experiments , 1970, Springer US.

[9]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Isolating attentional systems: A cognitive-anatomical analysis , 1987, Psychobiology.

[10]  J D Durrant,et al.  Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. , 1993, American journal of audiology.

[11]  Christian Giguère,et al.  A multi-purpose facility for research on hearing protection , 1990 .

[12]  M Konishi,et al.  Listening with two ears. , 1993, Scientific American.

[13]  Peter W.Alberti,et al.  Otologic Medicine and Surgery , 1988 .

[14]  F. Donders,et al.  Over de snelheid van psychische Processen , 1868 .

[15]  A. Welford.  Choice reaction time: Basic concepts , 1980 .

[16]  S M Abel,et al.  Stimulus parameters in detection and reaction time. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[17]  S. Abel,et al.  Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[18]  David B. Moody,et al.  Reaction Time as an Index of Sensory Function , 1970 .

[19]  S M Abel,et al.  Sound localization: effects of reverberation time, speaker array, stimulus frequency, and stimulus rise/decay. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J SWETS,et al.  Decision processes in perception. , 1961, Psychological review.

[21]  Tom C. T. Yin,et al.  Physiological Studies of Directional Hearing , 1983 .

[22]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  E. Renzi.  Disorders of space exploration and cognition , 1982 .

[24]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Unit study of monkey frontal cortex: active localization of auditory and of visual stimuli. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  A D Musicant,et al.  The influence of pinnae-based spectral cues on sound localization. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.