Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations.

From very early in life, humans can approximate the number and surface area of objects in a scene. The ability to discriminate between 2 approximate quantities, whether number or area, critically depends on the ratio between the quantities, with the most difficult ratio that a participant can reliably discriminate known as the Weber fraction. While developmental improvements in the Weber fraction have been demonstrated for number, the developmental trajectory of improvement in area discrimination remains unknown. Here we investigated whether the development of area discrimination parallels that of number discrimination. We tested forty 3- to 6-year-old children and adults in both a number and an area discrimination task in which participants selected the greater of 2 quantities across a range of ratios. We used formal psychophysical models to derive, for each participant and each age group, the Weber fraction for both number and area discrimination. We found that, like number acuity, area acuity steadily improves during childhood. However, we also found area acuity to be consistently higher than number acuity, suggesting a potential difference in the underlying mechanisms that encode and/or represent approximate area and approximate number. We discuss these findings in the context of quantity processing and its development.

[1]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence , 2011, Cognition.

[3]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Speed discrimination in 6- and 10-month-old infants follows Weber's law. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Midori Tokita,et al.  How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[6]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Measurement Error in Psychological Research: Lessons From 26 Research Scenarios , 1996 .

[7]  Susan C. Levine,et al.  Quantitative Development in Infancy and Early Childhood , 2002 .

[8]  A. Nieder Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[10]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Six-month-old infants use analog magnitudes to represent duration. , 2006, Developmental science.

[11]  E. Brannon,et al.  The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: using number is just easier. , 2008, Child development.

[12]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Small and large number discrimination in guppies , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[13]  N. Anderson,et al.  The height?+?width rule in children's judgments of quantity , 1978 .

[14]  Tim Hunter,et al.  Young children's understanding of "more" and discrimination of number and surface area. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The development of area discrimination and its implications for number representation in infancy. , 2006, Developmental science.

[16]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Sylvie Droit-Volet,et al.  Time, Number and Length: Similarities and Differences in Discrimination in Adults and Children , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Nachmias Judging spatial properties of simple figures , 2008, Vision Research.

[21]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  M. Teghtsoonian THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[24]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[25]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[26]  Basil Yeaxlee,et al.  A child's understanding , 1965 .

[27]  Onur Güntürkün,et al.  A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[28]  J. Emmerton Numerosity differences and effects of stimulus density on pigeons’ discrimination performance , 1998 .

[29]  E. Brannon,et al.  Attending to One of Many: When Infants are Surprisingly Poor at Discriminating an Item's Size , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[30]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[31]  H S Terrace,et al.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[32]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  The equality of quantity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[34]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[35]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[36]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. , 2011, Developmental science.

[37]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[38]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[40]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children , 2009, Cognition.

[41]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[42]  S. Dehaene Origins of Mathematical Intuitions , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[43]  M J Morgan,et al.  The visual computation of 2-D area by human observers , 2005, Vision Research.

[44]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Sumarga H. Suanda,et al.  Temporal discrimination increases in precision over development and parallels the development of numerosity discrimination. , 2007, Developmental science.

[46]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling , 2010, Cognition.

[47]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[49]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. , 2010, Developmental science.

[50]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[51]  H. Barth,et al.  Judgments of discrete and continuous quantity: An illusory Stroop effect , 2008, Cognition.

[52]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Context effects and their interaction with development: Area judgments , 1990 .

[53]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[54]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[55]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Emergence of a 'visual number sense' in hierarchical generative models , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Marc D Hauser,et al.  Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton–top tamarins , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  J. Wilmer How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis. , 2008, Spatial Vision.

[58]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[59]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). , 2011, Child development.

[60]  N. Anderson,et al.  Test of a multiplying model for estimated area of rectangles. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[61]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  "Constructive" enumeration by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on a computerized task , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[62]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[63]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: a functional MRI study. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[65]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Child's Understanding of Number , 1979 .

[66]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.