Computational evaluation of the compositional factors in fracture healing affecting ultrasound axial transmission measurements.

This work aimed at computationally evaluating the compositional factors in fracture healing affecting ultrasound axial transmission (UAT), using four numerical daily-changing healing models, representing more realistic clinical conditions. Using two-dimensional (2-D) simulations, a 1-MHz source and a receiver were positioned parallel to the bone surface to detect the first arriving signal (FAS). The time-of-flight of the FAS (TOF(FAS)) was found to be sensitive only to superficial modifications in the propagation path. It was also shown that callus mature bone better explained alone the variation in TOF(FAS) (R(2) >or= 0.70, p < 0.001). Better TOF(FAS) predictions are obtained when using the callus composition inside cortical fracture gap (R(2) = 0.98, p < 0.01). Callus composition could not well explain the changes in energy attenuation. These results suggest that UAT may be an important clinical tool for fracture healing assessment, identifying callus degree of mineralization and possible consolidation delays and nonunions.

[1]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  An In Vitro Study of the Ultrasonic Axial Transmission Technique at the Radius: 1‐MHz Velocity Measurements Are Sensitive to Both Mineralization and Intracortical Porosity , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  A mechano-regulatory bone-healing model incorporating cell-phenotype specific activity. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Dimitrios I Fotiadis,et al.  The effect of boundary conditions on guided wave propagation in two-dimensional models of healing bone. , 2008, Ultrasonics.

[4]  A. M. Phillips Overview of the fracture healing cascade. , 2005, Injury.

[5]  Hanna Isaksson,et al.  Sensitivity of tissue differentiation and bone healing predictions to tissue properties. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations of mechanical properties and mineral content of the external callus during bone healing. , 2009, Bone.

[7]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Micro‐CT analysis with multiple thresholds allows detection of bone formation and resorption during ultrasound‐treated fracture healing , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  D.I. Fotiadis,et al.  Ultrasonic monitoring of bone fracture healing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  C F Njeh,et al.  The use of quantitative ultrasound to monitor fracture healing: a feasibility study using phantoms. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[11]  Dimitrios I Fotiadis,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element modeling of guided ultrasound wave propagation in intact and healing long bones. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Gangming Luo,et al.  Ultrasound simulation in bone , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  An ultrasound wearable system for the monitoring and acceleration of fracture healing in long bones , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  C Ament,et al.  A fuzzy logic model of fracture healing. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[16]  L. Claes,et al.  Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. , 2005, Bone.

[17]  S Gheduzzi,et al.  An in vitro study of ultrasound signal loss across simple fractures in cortical bone mimics and bovine cortical bone samples. , 2007, Bone.

[18]  E. Bossy,et al.  Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. Dodd,et al.  Numerical and experimental simulation of the effect of long bone fracture healing stages on ultrasound transmission across an idealized fracture. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. Sedel,et al.  Current trends in the enhancement of fracture healing. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  E. Bossy,et al.  In vivo performance evaluation of bi-directional ultrasonic axial transmission for cortical bone assessment. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  C C Glüer,et al.  Monitoring Skeletal Changes by Radiological Techniques , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  V. Humphrey,et al.  Modelling the effects of different fracture geometries and healing stages on ultrasound signal loss across a long bone fracture , 2007, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[24]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: comparison with in vivo results , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  Jiang Yao,et al.  Determining the most important cellular characteristics for fracture healing using design of experiments methods. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  R. Cobbold Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound , 2006 .

[27]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Eleftherios Tsiridis,et al.  Current concepts of molecular aspects of bone healing. , 2005, Injury.

[29]  G. W. Hyatt,et al.  Ultrasonic study of normal and fractured bone. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  M J Gómez-Benito,et al.  Computational simulation of fracture healing: influence of interfragmentary movement on the callus growth. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  V. Protopappas,et al.  Guided ultrasound wave propagation in intact and healing long bones. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[34]  Maryline Talmant,et al.  Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  Thomas A Einhorn,et al.  Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. , 2009, Bone.

[36]  Maryline Talmant,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Sabina Gheduzzi,et al.  Ultrasound transmission loss across transverse and oblique bone fractures: an in vitro study. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  H K Genant,et al.  A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[39]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  F. Patat,et al.  Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[41]  J. Virieux P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method , 1986 .

[42]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[43]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  M. Popovtzer,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. , 1995, Bone.