Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function

The problem of infeasibility arises in conventional radial super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) models under variable returns to scale (VRS). To tackle this issue, a Nerlove–Luenberger (N–L) measure of super-efficiency is developed based on a directional distance function. Although this N–L super-efficiency model does not suffer infeasibility problem as in the conventional radial super-efficiency DEA models, it can produce an infeasible solution in two special situations. The current paper proposes to modify the directional distance function by selecting proper feasible reference bundles so that the resulting N–L measure of super-efficiency is always feasible. As a result, our modified VRS super-efficiency model successfully addresses the infeasibility issues occurring either in conventional VRS models or the N–L super-efficiency model. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate our approach and compare results obtained from various super-efficiency measures.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Yao Chen,et al.  Ranking efficient units in DEA , 2004 .

[3]  I. M. Premachandra,et al.  DEA as a tool for predicting corporate failure and success: A case of bankruptcy assessment , 2011 .

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data , 2011 .

[6]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  The directional distance function and measurement of super-efficiency: an application to airlines data , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[9]  Ines Herrero,et al.  A modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics , 2010 .

[10]  Liang Liang,et al.  DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings , 2009 .

[11]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[12]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[15]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[16]  Yao Chen,et al.  Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..