Modelling the effect of electrode displacement on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

OBJECTIVE Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique that delivers a low-intensity, direct current to cortical areas with the purpose of modulating underlying brain activity. Recent studies have reported inconsistencies in tDCS outcomes. The underlying assumption of many tDCS studies has been that replication of electrode montage equates to replicating stimulation conditions. It is possible however that anatomical difference between subjects, as well as inherent inaccuracies in montage placement, could affect current flow to targeted areas. The hypothesis that stimulation of a defined brain region will be stable under small displacements was tested. APPROACH Initially, we compared the total simulated current flowing through ten specific brain areas for four commonly used tDCS montages: F3-Fp2, C3-Fp2, Fp1-F4, and P3-P4 using the software tool COMETS. The effect of a slight (~1 cm in each of four directions) anode displacement on the simulated regional current density for each of the four tDCS montages was then determined. Current flow was calculated and compared through ten segmented brain areas to determine the effect of montage type and displacement. The regional currents, as well as the localised current densities, were compared with the original electrode location, for each of these new positions. MAIN RESULTS Recommendations for montages that maximise stimulation current for the ten brain regions are considered. We noted that the extent to which stimulation is affected by electrode displacement varies depending on both area and montage type. The F3-Fp2 montage was found to be the least stable with up to 38% change in average current density in the left frontal lobe while the Fp1-F4 montage was found to the most stable exhibiting only 1% change when electrodes were displaced. SIGNIFICANCE These results indicate that even relatively small changes in stimulation electrode placement appear to result in surprisingly large changes in current densities and distribution.

[1]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Risk-Taking Behavior by Modulating Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Direct Current Stimulation Study , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  C. Im,et al.  What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation? , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  Yu Huang,et al.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[6]  H. Si,et al.  Adaptive tetrahedral mesh generation by constrained Delaunay refinement , 2008 .

[7]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  COMETS: A MATLAB toolbox for simulating local electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2013, Biomedical Engineering Letters.

[8]  J. Goodship,et al.  Centiles for adult head circumference. , 1992, Archives of disease in childhood.

[9]  C. Im,et al.  Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: Electric field simulation using individual MRI data , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  Rosalind J. Sadleir,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Socrates Dokos,et al.  A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. Deans,et al.  Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  F Lolas,et al.  Brain polarization: behavioral and therapeutic effects. , 1977, Biological psychiatry.

[16]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  Yu Huang,et al.  Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke , 2013, NeuroImage.

[18]  V. Walsh,et al.  Modulating Neuronal Activity Produces Specific and Long-Lasting Changes in Numerical Competence , 2010, Current Biology.

[19]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  The hypothesis of neuronal interconnectivity as a function of brain size—a general organization principle of the human connectome , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Hall Km,et al.  The Effects of Low Level DC Scalp Positive and Negative Current on the Performance of Various Tasks , 1970 .

[23]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Julie M. Baker,et al.  Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient , 2011, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[27]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[28]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Bartholow, Sciamanna, Alberti: Pioneers in the Electrical Stimulation of the Exposed Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[29]  L J Sheffield,et al.  The Effects of Polarization on Normal Subjects , 1968, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[30]  M. A. Roula,et al.  Effect of tDCS application on P300 potentials: A randomized, double blind placebo controlled study , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB).

[31]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[32]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation--the example of punishing unfairness. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  M. A. Roula,et al.  The effect of tDCS on ERD potentials: A randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB).

[34]  M. Bikson,et al.  Model of the effect of extracellular fields on spike time coherence , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.